Arcos Modular Revision Hip System 11-301342Recalls & reported problems
Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Arcos Modular Revision Hip System (71)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00880304474208), received between Jul 6, 2022 and Mar 25, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Jun 2, 2021Class IITerminated
Arcos Proximal Cone Bodies could potentially exhibit chatter in the inner taper fretting corrosion and device failure in vivo leading to surgical intervention
Z-2273-2021 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Migration1
- Osseointegration Problem1
- Separation Problem1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Pain2
- Failure of Implant1
- Hemarthrosis1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Insufficient Information1
- Medical device site infection1
- Synovitis1
- Unequal Limb Length1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 25, 2026Unstable; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISIONS SURGERY APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS POST-IMPLANTATION DUE TO PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS OF INFECTION, SYNOVITIS, STIFFNESS, AND AN OPEN WOUND. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE WOUND WAS DRAINING AND A LARGE CALIBER VEIN ON THE POSTERIOR DISTAL THIGH WAS BLEEDING. THE FEMORAL COMPONENT HAD ROTATION INSTABILITY, AND THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION OF THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER WITHOUT COMPLICATION. FOLLOW-UPS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE CURRENTLY IN PROCESS.
Patient problems: Hemarthrosis; Inadequate Osseointegration; Medical device site infection; Synovitis
MAUDE report 24687398 ↗InjurySep 9, 2025Separation Problem; Separation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION DUE TO THE TROCHANTERIC BOLT BACKING OUT OF THE SCREW HOLE THAT IS USED TO SECURE THE TROCHANTERIC CLAW TO THE PROXIMAL BODY. IT HAS NOT BEEN CONFIRMED WHICH COMPONENTS WERE REVISED, BUT A SCREW WAS REMOVED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Pain
MAUDE report 23003857 ↗InjuryJul 8, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
NO FURTHER INFORMATION AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Pain; Unequal Limb Length
MAUDE report 22435149 ↗InjuryJul 6, 2022Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT HIP REVISION APPROXIMATELY 8 WEEKS POST IMPLANTATION DUE TO THE ARCOS DISTAL SLOTTED STEM SUBSIDING. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 14934159 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish devices
- Arcos Modular Revision Hip System 11-301310Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish1 recall9 reports
- Tritanium 502-03-52DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish39 reports
- V40 Head 6260-5-332Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish12 reports
- EXETER 0580-1-443Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish11 reports
- V40 Head 6260-9-032Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish11 reports
- Trident 509-02-56EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish10 reports
- Taperloc Complete Primary Femoral 51-104180Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish9 reports
- Taperloc Complete Primary Femoral 51-103200Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish7 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page