Skip to content

eCareManager 4.7Recalls & reported problems

Visicu, Inc. · Telehealth Center Product License · Class 2

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00884838115460), received between Aug 28, 2024 and Aug 28, 2024 — classified as 1 death.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Intermittent Communication Failure” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Intermittent Communication Failure1

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Arrest1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • DeathAug 28, 2024Intermittent Communication Failure; Intermittent Communication Failure

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTING A DELAY IN PROVIDING TREATMENT TO A PATIENT IN THE SICU IN CARDIAC ARREST, REPORTEDLY ASSOCIATED WITH AN ISSUE WHERE THE CAREGILITY EQUIPMENT WAS NOT ALLOWING MORE THAN ONE PERSON ON A CAMERA AT A TIME. THE BEDSIDE RN¿S WERE UNENGAGED AND APPARENTLY UNTRAINED IN CPR AND THE PATIENT WAS IN CARDIAC ARREST FOR AT LEAST 90 SECONDS. THE RN WAS ON CAMERA AND IMPLORING THE BEDSIDE TO GET HELP AND BEGIN CPR. THE PHYSICIAN WAS AWARE, BUT GIVEN THE LIMITATIONS OF CAREGILITY, UNABLE TO OPERATE THE CAMERA TO BEGIN CARE. IN THE MIDST OF THIS, ASSISTANT NURSE MANAGER HAD TO CALL THE MICU DIRECTOR TO ASK FOR BEDSIDE ASSISTANCE, WHICH WAS PROVIDED. INITIAL GFE RESPONSE FROM THE CUSTOMER STATES THAT, THEY ARE UNCLEAR WHETHER ANY ALARMS GENERATED BUT ¿OFTEN THOUGH CARDIAC ARREST DOES NOT TRIGGER ALARMS.¿ THE CUSTOMER WAS UNAWARE OF THE PATIENT OUTCOME BUT STATED THAT THEY WERE CRITICALLY ILL, IN CARDIAC ARREST AND THEY FEEL THAT THE DELAY IN CARE WOULD BE A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO A NEGATIVE OUTCOME, IF SUCH AN OUTCOME DID OCCUR. OF NOTE, IN TERMS OF THE HOSPITAL WORKFLOW AND STAFFING RATIOS, GFE RESPONSE INDICATES THE ¿RN¿S WORK A 1:50 RATIO¿ AND FINDING/GATHERING THE APPROPRI

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest

    MAUDE report 20084654 ↗

Other System, network and communication, physiological monitors devices

All System, network and communication, physiological monitors devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.