Skip to content

ULTRABRAID 72203842Recalls & reported problems

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · SUTUREFIX ULTRA AHR XL 2 UB BLUE/WH · Class 2 · Implant

All models of ULTRABRAID (11)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00885554031553), received between Mar 19, 2018 and Nov 13, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break6
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Fracture1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Failure of Implant2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE SUTUREFIX DEVICE LEFT THE METAL ATTACH. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH NO DELAY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. PER PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION, THE VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THE DISTAL TIP OF THE ACTUATOR BAR IS FRACTURED AWAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18120817 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE SUTUREFIX ULTRA WAS BROKEN IN THE HOLE. ALL THE PIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT BY SUCTION. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT DELAY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE IN THE SAME BONE HOLE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12695122 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 10, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER A LEFT HIP ARTHROSCOPY, THE SUTURE ANCHOR INTRODUCER WAS FOUND BROKEN IN THE BONE. THREE LOT NUMBERS WERE PROVIDED (50621753, 50566979, 50608909) BUT IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH ONE IS THE ONE THAT BROKE. THE BROKEN ANCHOR GUIDE PIECE IDENTIFIED IN LEFT HIP. THE IMPLANT WAS LEFT IN SITU AND NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 12304812 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2021Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A HIP LABRUM SUTURE SURGERY PROCEDURE, TWO SUTUREFIX ULTRA AHR XL 2 UB BLUE/ WH BROKE DURING THE IMPLANTATION SINCE THE MECHANISM DID NOT ALLOW THE ANCHORS TO BE RELEASED. PROCEDURE FINISHED WITH TWO SUTUREFIX BACKUP IMPLANTS WITH NO DELAY. THE PATIENT WILL BE HOSPITALIZED AGAIN BECAUSE THERE IS A RESIDUAL FOREIGN BODY IN HER HIP.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 12015852 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A HIP LABRUM SUTURE SURGERY PROCEDURE, TWO SUTUREFIX ULTRA AHR XL 2 UB BLUE/WH BROKE DURING THE IMPLANTATION SINCE THE MECHANISM DID NOT ALLOW THE ANCHORS TO BE RELEASED. PROCEDURE FINISHED WITH TWO SUTUREFIX BACKUP IMPLANTS WITH NO DELAY. THE PATIENT WILL BE HOSPITALIZED AGAIN BECAUSE THERE IS A RESIDUAL FOREIGN BODY IN HER HIP.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 12015851 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 25, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ARTHROSCOPY, AFTER DRILLING, THE ANCHOR WAS INSERTED, UNLOCKED AND SET. DOCTOR NOTICED THAT THE SUTUREFIX ULTRA AHR XL 2 UB BLUE/WH BROKE OFF IN THE JOINT. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. THE METAL COULD NOT BE REMOVED, AFTER X-RAY CONTROL IT WAS FOUND THAT PARTS OF THE ANCHOR ARE IN THE JOINT, PATIENT WAS OPERATED AGAIN ON (B)(6) 2021 AND ALL THE REMAINING BROKEN PARTS COULD BE REMOVED. NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. IT IS UNKNOWN THE PATIENT OUTCOME. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11572371 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 25, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING HIP ARTHROSCOPY LABRAL REPAIR SURGERY, THE ANCHOR WAS IMPLANTED BUT IT DID NOT GET A GOOD GRIP BECAUSE OF POOR BONE QUALITY. A BACKUP WAS USED IN AN ADDITIONAL BONE HOLE. NO DELAY OR PATIENT INJURIES WERE REPORTED. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9999259 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 19, 2018Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUTURE FIX XL ANCHOR WAS PLACED IN ACETABULAR RIM. UPON REMOVAL OF IMPLANT INSERTER AN X-RAY WAS TAKEN. THE TWO PRONGS ON THE DISTAL TIP OF THE IMPLANT INSERTER BROKE OFF AND WERE EMBEDDED IN THE PATIENT¿S BONE. SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE BROKEN PIECE BUT IT WAS TOO FAR INTO BONE SO IT WAS LEFT. UNSURE OF HOW THE INSERTER BROKE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A BACK-UP DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 7349017 ↗

Other FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices

All FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page