Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-1322-752SFRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · SUTR ANCH,FASTAK,SM BONE · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867010130), received between Mar 16, 2017 and Feb 11, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Failure to Advance2
  • Positioning Failure2
  • Detachment Of Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 11, 2026Failure to Advance

    ON (B)(6) 2026, A COMPETENT AUTHORITY REPORTED VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-1322-752SF SMALL BONE FASTAK SUTURE ANCHOR WAS DEPLOYED BUT DID NOT REMAIN DOCKED IN THE BONE. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 23-JAN-2026: THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A UCL THUMB PROCEDURE. THERE WERE TWO AR-1322-752SF SMALL BONE FASTAK SUTURE ANCHOR THAT WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AS THE ANCHORS PULLED OUT OF THE BONE. A REPLACEMENT AR-1322-752SF SMALL BONE FASTAK SUTURE ANCHOR WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO CASE DELAY OR ADDED ANESTHESIA ADMINISTERED. NO ADVERSE EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24312560 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Failure to Advance

    ON 19-JAN-2026, A COMPETENT AUTHORITY REPORTED VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-1322-752SF SMALL BONE FASTAK SUTURE ANCHOR WAS DEPLOYED BUT DID NOT REMAIN DOCKED IN THE BONE. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 23-JAN-2026: THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A UCL THUMB PROCEDURE. THERE WERE TWO AR-1322-752SF SMALL BONE FASTAK SUTURE ANCHOR THAT WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AS THE ANCHORS PULLED OUT OF THE BONE. A REPLACEMENT AR-1322-752SF SMALL BONE FASTAK SUTURE ANCHOR WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO CASE DELAY OR ADDED ANESTHESIA ADMINISTERED. NO ADVERSE EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24299034 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    ON (B)(6) 2025, IT WAS REPORTED BY A DISTRIBUTOR VIA (B)(6) THAT (2) AR-1322-752SF SMALL BONE FASTAK¿ SUTURE ANCHOR WITH 2-0 FIBERWIRE DID NOT RELEASE CORRECTLY. THIS OCCURRED DURING REPAIR OF ULNAR COLLATERAL LIGAMENT WHEN THE FIRST ANCHOR DID NOT RELEASE CORRECTLY. IT EMBEDDED PARTIALLY. THE SURGEON HAD TO FINISH ANCHORING IT IN USING A MALLET. THIS DID NOT WORK AND SHE THEN HAD TO CUT IT OUT AND TRY AGAIN AT A DIFFRENT SITE. A NEW SUTURE ANCHOR WAS OPENED AND THIS ONE ALSO DID NOT DEPLOY CORRECTLY. IT CUT BOTH THE SUTURES WHEN SHE WENT TO RELEASE IT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21619664 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    ON (B)(6) 2025, IT WAS REPORTED BY A DISTRIBUTOR VIA (B)(4) THAT (2) AR-1322-752SF SMALL BONE FASTAK¿ SUTURE ANCHOR WITH 2-0 FIBERWIRE DID NOT RELEASE CORRECTLY. THIS OCCURRED DURING REPAIR OF ULNAR COLLATERAL LIGAMENT WHEN THE FIRST ANCHOR DID NOT RELEASE CORRECTLY. IT EMBEDDED PARTIALLY. THE SURGEON HAD TO FINISH ANCHORING IT IN USING A MALLET. THIS DID NOT WORK AND SHE THEN HAD TO CUT IT OUT AND TRY AGAIN AT A DIFFERENT SITE. A NEW SUTURE ANCHOR WAS OPENED AND THIS ONE ALSO DID NOT DEPLOY CORRECTLY. IT CUT BOTH THE SUTURES WHEN SHE WENT TO RELEASE IT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21619577 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2017Break; Detachment Of Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A WRIST LIGAMENT REATTACHMENT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON SCREWED IN THE FASTTAK, UNSLID THE DOOR, PULLED OUT THE HANDLE AND BEGAN TO ATTACH THE TENDON WHEN THE FIBERWIRE SNAPPED-OFF FROM THE BASE OF THE ANCHOR LEAVING TWO TAILS WITH NEEDLES ON EACH. THE ANCHOR WAS REMOVED AND THE SURGEON DRILLED TUNNELS AND PASSED SUTURE TO TIE THE TENDON DOWN INSTEAD. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT. FOLLOW-UP INVESTIGATION: ALL COMPONENTS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE INSERTER WITH METAL ANCHOR AND SUTURE ARE BEING SENT BACK TO ARTHREX FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7048069 ↗
  • InjuryMar 16, 2017Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ATFL REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE DRIVER SHAFT ON THE SMALL BONE FASTAK¿ SUTURE ANCHOR WITH 2-0 FIBERWIRE BROKE AS THE ANCHOR WAS BEING SEATED INTO THE BONE. ALL METAL FRAGMENTS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND THE TIP OF THE DRIVER WAS REMOVED FROM THE ANCHOR, HOWEVER, THE BROKEN ANCHOR HAD TO BE LEFT IN. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO TRIM THE ANCHOR DOWN TO BE FLUSH WITH THE BONE. A NEW SMALL BONE FASTAK¿ SUTURE ANCHOR WITH 2-0 FIBERWIRE WAS USED IN AN ADJACENT SPOT TO COMPLETE THE CASE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 6411487 ↗

Other Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices

All Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page