Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-1928SF-2-1Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · SUTURE ANCHOR, CORKSCREW FT II · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867023710), received between Mar 29, 2019 and Sep 9, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Inflammation1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE IMPLANT FELL OUT OF THE BONE DURING SUTURE TIGHTENING. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23000600 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 6, 2025Break; Naturally Worn; Break; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE THREADS IN THE ANCHOR WERE WORN. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. UPDATE AVOE 30-JAN-2025: IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE ERROR OCCURRED DURING INSERTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21321158 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 9, 2022Break

    ON THE (B)(6) 2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP THAT THE SURGEON WAS DOING HIS STANDARD ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR USING A 5.5MM SUTURE ANCHOR, CORKSCREW FT II. THE SURGEON HAD ALREADY INSERTED 2 OF THEM SUCCESSFULLY. HOWEVER, WHEN THE THIRD ANCHOR WAS PLACED IN THE MEDIAL ROW, AFTER HE HAD PASSED THE SUTURES & TIED HIS KNOTS, THE SUTURE EYELET INSIDE THE ANCHOR THAT CONTAINS THE SUTURES BROKE. THE SMALL WHITE SUTURE EYELET COMING OUT OF THE ANCHOR BROKEN WAS VISIBLE. THE SURGEON MENTIONED THIS WAS THE SECOND TIME IN A FEW WEEKS THE SAME ISSUE HAD OCCURRED. HE WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE THE ANCHOR, THE METAL ANCHOR REMAINS INSITU. ANOTHER CORKSCREW ANCHOR WAS PLACED OVER THE TOP OF THE EXISTING ANCHOR WHICH WAS SUCCESSFUL, AND THE REPAIR COMPLETED IN HIS STANDARD TECHNIQUE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15758726 ↗
  • InjurySep 6, 2022Loose or Intermittent Connection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY SURGERY THE SUTURE OF THE DEVICE WAS LOOSE AFTER SCREWING. ALL PARTS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SUTURETAK AND A SWIVELOCK BY SWITCHING THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO DO A SECOND SURGERY. UPDATE (B)(6) 2022 IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT ONLY THE SUTURE OF THE DEVICE WAS LOOSE AND TORE. NO OTHER BREAKAGE OCCURRED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15362666 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT THAT ON (B)(6) 2016 A LABRUM-FIXATION WITH FIBERTAK 1.5 TIGERWIRE WAS PERFORMED WITH PATIENT. SINCE THIS SURGERY SHE SUFFERS FROM INVALIDATING PAIN, ESPECIALLY IN THE AREA OF THE SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE AND THE BRACHIAL PLEXUS. UPDATE 22-FEB-2019: THE PATIENT WAS OPERATED FOR A SIMPLE SLAP (SUPERIOR LABRUM FROM ANTERIOR TO POSTERIOR) LESION WITH BICEPS TENODESIS (1X CORKSCREW) AND REFIXATION OF THE POST LABRUM WITH 2 FIBERTAK`S . POST-OP THE PATIENT SHOWED CLASSIC RESIDUAL SYMPTOMS LIKE A CAPSULITIS. EVEN THOUGH THE PATIENT SHOWED SIGNS OF CAPSULITIS, THE SURGEON DOES NOT THINK THAT IT IS CAUSED BY THE ARTHREX DEVICE. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON THE PATIENT IS HYPERREACTIVE AND EXTREMELY SKEPTICAL. IN THE MEANTIME, SHE HAS BEEN RE-OPERATED TWICE BY DIFFERENT HOSPITALS/SURGEONS. ACCORDING TO THE PATIENT AFTER EACH SURGERY IT GETS WORSE. UPDATE 11-MAR-2019: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE INVOLVED IN THE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2016: TWO PIECES AR-1928SF-2-1, LOT NUMBER: 759948 AND 759948. THREE PIECES OF AR-3600 LOT NUMBERS: 1552643 ; 1552643 ; 300375.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain

    MAUDE report 8464084 ↗

Other Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices

All Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page