Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-2291Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · PROXIMAL TENODESIS BUTTON REV: 0 · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867026704), received between Feb 1, 2021 and Dec 9, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    ON 11/21/2025, A DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-2291 PROXIMAL TENODESIS BUTTON EXPERIENCED AN ISSUE DURING USE. THE PLASTIC PROTECTIVE PIECE THAT NORMALLY SITS OVER THE TOP OF THE BUTTON WAS NOT ATTACHED TO THE BUTTON AND WAS FOUND LOOSE IN THE PACKAGING. AS A RESULT, THE PEG THAT SECURES THE BUTTON WAS WEAKENED, AND THE BUTTON SNAPPED WHEN THE USER ATTEMPTED TO THREAD THE FIBERWIRE THROUGH. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A BICEPS TENODESIS PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025, WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 11/26/2025: DURING A BICEPS TENODESIS PROCEDURE, TWO AR-2291 PROXIMAL TENODESIS BUTTONS FROM THE SAME LOT WERE OPENED. UPON OPENING THE PACKAGING, STAFF OBSERVED THAT THE PLASTIC PROTECTIVE PIECES WERE NOT ATTACHED TO THE BUTTONS AND WERE LOOSE WITHIN THE PACKAGING. AFTER THREADING FIBERWIRE THROUGH THE FIRST BUTTON, IT SNAPPED OFF IMMEDIATELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A SECOND AR-2291 PROXIMAL TENODESIS BUTTON, WHICH ALSO LACKED THE PROTECTIVE PIECE; HOWEVER, THE SURGEON SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED IT WITH EXTRA CAUTION, AND THE BUTTON DID NOT SNAP. THE DELAY WAS APPROXIMATELY FIVE MINUTES TO OPEN THE AR-2291 REPLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY WAS

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23759250 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REFIXATION OF THE LONG BICEPS TENDON THE IMPLANT BROKE OFF WHEN THE SURGEON INSERTED IT. THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETRIEVED OUT OF THE PATIENT AND THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. UPDATE DW 29-FEB-2024: IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE THREAD OF THE INSERTER BROKE OFF. THE IMPLANT HAS BEEN IMPLANTED CORRECTLY. THE BROKEN THREAD WAS REMOVED. THE OPERATION WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH THE SAME IMPLANT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18858565 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 6, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROXIMAL BICEPS TENDON REFIXATION SURGERY THE BUTTON COULDN`T BE DETACHED (ROTATED) FROM THE INSERTER. THE THREAD IS BROKEN OFF ON BOTH ITEMS. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. UPDATE AVOE (B)(6) 2023: IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE DEVICES BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT AND ALL FRAGMENTS COULD BE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. UPDATE AVOE (B)(6) 2023: IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICES WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17266721 ↗
  • InjuryJan 23, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2023 BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-3636 FIBERTAK AND AR-2291 BUTTON ARE INVOLVED IN A PATIENT INFECTION, SOURCE OF INFECTION UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 16223361 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 8, 2022Break

    ON (B)(6) 2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-2291 PROXIMAL TENODESIS BUTTON BROKE OFF THE INSERTER. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15183233 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 1, 2021Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROXIMAL BICEPS TENODESIS SURGERY WHILE INSERTING THE BUTTON THE GRUB SCREW BROKE OFF. THE REMAINED INSIDE THE BUTTON. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY AND IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11258732 ↗

Other FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices

All FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page