Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-7229-20Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · 4-0 FIBERLOOP, 20 INCHES WITH NEEDLE · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867041608), received between Apr 18, 2018 and Aug 14, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Frayed” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Frayed1
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1

Patient problems

  • Burning Sensation1
  • Inflammation1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Pain1
  • Reaction1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 14, 2024Material Frayed; Material Frayed

    ON (B)(6) 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX SUBSIDIARY EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-7229-20 FIBERLOOP WAS FRAYED. THIS WAS DISCOVERED UPON OPENING THE PACKAGE DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER AR-7229-20 FIBERLOOP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19987985 ↗
  • InjuryApr 18, 2018Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD PRIOR SURGERY WHICH RESULTED IN A PATIENT REACTION TO THE SUTURES THAT WERE USED. THE PRIOR SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2017. IT WAS A LEFT THUMB CMC ARTHROPLASTY. SUTURES USED IN THE PRIOR SURGERY WERE ULNAR CAPSULE SUTURE 4-0 SUPRAMID (S. JACKSON) AND SUBCUTICULAR SUTURE 4-0 PROLENE (J&J). NO ARTHREX PRODUCTS WERE USED DURING THIS PRIOR SURGERY. REACTION SYMPTOMS BEGAN WITHIN 7-10 DAYS OF PRIOR SURGERY. REACTION WAS INFLAMMATION, HEAT AND A BURNING FEELING. NO PAIN WAS INVOLVED IN THE REACTION FROM THIS PRIOR SURGERY. PATIENT WAS PUT ON ANTIBIOTICS AS A PRECAUTION, BUT SYMPTOMS SUBSIDED UPON REMOVING THE SUTURES AT 14 DAYS POST OP. AROUND 7 MONTHS POST JOINT REPLACEMENT PATIENT BEGAN HAVING PAIN IN THE JOINT. AT THAT TIME IT WAS DETERMINED PATIENT HAD A PROMINENT OSTEOPHYTE AND POTENTIAL FCR TENDONITIS. SURGERY WAS SCHEDULED AND PERFORMED (B)(6) 2018, 11 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIOR SURGERY THAT RESULTED IN A REACTION TO THE SUTURES. THE SECOND SURGERY WAS A LEFT THUMB TRAPEZIAL OSTEOPHYTE REACTION AND LEFT THUMB FCR TENOTOMY. PATIENT RECEIVED ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S IMPLANT (SKELETAL DYNAMICS) DURING THE (B)(6) 2018 SURGERY. SUTURES USED DURING THE (B)(6) 201

    Patient problems: Burning Sensation; Inflammation; Pain; Reaction

    MAUDE report 7439304 ↗

Other SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE devices

All SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page