Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-1588AL-CPRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · IMPL SYS, ALLOGRAFT GRAFTLINK CP · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867200654), received between Feb 26, 2020 and Jan 24, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Positioning Failure1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 24, 2024Break; Break

    ON 1/6/2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT THE TIGHTROPE ABS FROM AN AR-1588AL-CP ALLOGRAFT GRAFTLINK KIT, SNAPPED DURING THE FINAL TENSIONING ON THE 14MM CONCAVE BUTTON FOR TIBIAL FIXATION. SURGEON HAD A TIBIAL WHIPSTITCH SUTURE ATTACHED TO THE TIGHTROPE, WHICH WAS USED TO PULL TENSION WHILE THE SOFT TISSUE SCREW WAS INSERTED. CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 1/9/2023: THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN ACLR PROCEDURE, AND ALL THE BROKEN TIGHTROPE WAS REMOVED FROM INSIDE THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18570472 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2022Break

    ON (B)(6) 2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-1588AL-CP ALLOGRAFT GRAFTLINK WAS BEING TIGHTENED DOWN TO THE TIBIA WITH A SPARE BTB TIGHTROPE, THE SUTURES BROKE JUST BELOW THE BUTTON CONSTRUCT. THE GRAFT WAS PULLED OUT AND A NEW ONE WAS OPENED. SURGEON HAD TO SLIGHTLY ALTER PROCEDURE WITH A FULL TIBIAL TUNNEL THROUGH THE CORTEX AND A 14MM BUTTON APPLIED USING AN ABS TIGHTROPE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN ALL INSIDE ALLOGRAFT GRAFTLINK ACL PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13619981 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2020Positioning Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING AN ACL PROCEDURE THAT THE FEMORAL END OF THE FGLTS09575 FLEXIGRAFT GRAFTLINK GRAFT WAS RECEIVED SUTURED POORLY ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON AND REP. THE BULKY, FEMORAL SIDE WAS VISUALLY A CONCERN (SEE ATTACHED PICTURES) BEFORE IT PHYSICALLY BECAME SUCH A PROBLEM THAT THE GRAFT HAD TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S JOINT, TRIMMED DOWN, AND REATTACHED TO A NEW TIGHTROPE. THIS ADDED 1.5/2 HOURS TO THE CASE, AND QUITE A BIT OF FRUSTRATION. A 9.5 X 75 FGLTS WAS ORDERED, APPROXIMATELY 9 (TIB)/ 10(FEM) X 77 WAS RECEIVED. THE REP REPORTED THE TIB SIDE WAS GREAT. THE FEM SIDE HAD A SUTURE BULK STICKING OUT OF ONE SIDE. THE REP STATED IT WASN¿T THAT THE GRAFT WASN'T PERFECTLY 9.5 X 75, IT WAS THAT THE SUTURING OF THE FEMORAL SIDE WAS DONE POORLY. THERE WAS ALSO A BULK OF SUTURE THAT THE SURGEON COULD NOT SEAT INTO THE CROTCH THAT CAUSED A LOT OF FRUSTRATION. THE REPORTED ISSUES WERE NOTICEABLE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THAWING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 02/10/2020: THE REP REPORTED IN ADDITION TO PROLONGED ANESTHESIA THE PATIENT ALSO UNDERWENT ADDITIONAL TOURNIQUET TIME. THE GRAFT WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED DURING THE SECOND IMPLANTATION ATTEMPT. THE REP REPORTED SOME PLAN

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9756015 ↗

Other Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices

All Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page