Arthrex® AR-2923PS-1Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867280779), received between Oct 12, 2021 and Aug 21, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionAug 21, 2025Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGERY THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING INSERTION. THE BROKEN PART REMAINED EMBEDDED IN THE BONE AND COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED WITHOUT RISK OF FURTHER COMPLICATIONS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

  Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

  MAUDE report 22860072 ↗
• MalfunctionFeb 12, 2025Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY THE EYELET BROKE. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 21363937 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 12, 2021Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LABRUM REFIXATION TWO ANCHORS BROKE OFF WHILE THEY WERE IMPLANTED. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO RETRIEVE TO BROKEN PARTS OUT OF THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY REPORTED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. ON 23-SEP-21: UPDATE: FURTHER INFORMATION WERE PROVIDED THAT THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED BY THE SURGEON BECAUSE THE LABRUM REFIXATION WAS NOT MANDATORY IN THIS CASE AND THE PATIENT HAD OTHER PATHOLOGIES IN THE JOINT THAT WERE SUCCESSFULLY TREATED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 12616332 ↗