Arthrex® AR-3602HRecalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · HIP FiberTak SUTR ANCH, w/ 1.3mm SUTRTP · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867295520), received between May 28, 2020 and May 9, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break4
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 9, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ON 12/16/2021 IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS THAT THREE AR-3602H ANCHORS PULLED OUT OF THE BONE DURING A HIP ARTHROSCOPY. THE FIRST ONE PULLED OUT OF THE BONE WHEN IT WAS SET. IT WAS REPLACED AND THE SAME EVENT OCCURRED. A THIRD ANCHOR WAS USED BUT ONCE AGAIN PULLED OUT. THE ANCHORS WERE REPLACED WITH A NON ARTHREX PRODUCTS AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER ISSUES. THE CASE INVOLVED A 32 YEAR OLD FEMALE. TO DATE, SHE IS FINE. THE REP IS ALSO RETURNING THE AR-3600ND-2H DRILL BIT TO BE INSPECTED ALSO.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19277616 ↗MalfunctionJun 6, 2022Break
ON 5/19/2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALE REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-3602H HIP FIBERTAK SUTURE ANCHOR INSERTER BROKE. THE ANCHOR WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED AND ALL BROKEN FRAGMENTS RETRIEVED. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN HIP ACETABULUM REPAIR ON (B)(6) 2022
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14602964 ↗InjurySep 21, 2020Break; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A (B)(6) 2020 HIP ARTHROSCOPY/LABRAL REPAIR PROCEDURE FOUR AR-3602H, HIP FIBERTAK SUTURE ANCHORS (LOT 10298673), WERE USED. ONE OF THE INSERTER TIPS (APPROXIMATELY 1.5 - 2 CM) BROKE OFF AND WAS EMBEDDED IN THE PATIENT'S BONE. FRAGMENT WAS UNABLE TO BE RETRIEVED. SALES REPRESENTATIVE WHO WAS PRESENT REPORTS THE SURGEON DID NOT USE EXCESSIVE FORCE TO IMPLANT THE DEVICE AND FOLLOWED THE INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE TECHNIQUE GUIDE.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 10562574 ↗InjurySep 10, 2020Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ONE OF THE METAL FORK TIPS ON THE INSERTER BROKE OFF DURING IMPLANT. THEY COULD NOT LOCATE THE TIP WITH X-RAY. THE CASE WAS A HIP LABRAL REPAIR.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 10517109 ↗InjuryMay 28, 2020Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A HIP LABRAL REPAIR PROCEDURE, WHEN THE SURGEON WAS IMPACTING THE AR-3602H, THE ANCHOR BENT. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER ISSUES. DURING THE FOLLOWUP VISIT IT WAS FOUND THAT A PIECE OF THE IMPACTOR HAD BROKEN OFF. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED 5/5/2020: DURING THE FOLLOW UP VISIT AN X-RAY WAS TAKEN AND THE METALLIC FRAGMENT WAS VISUALIZED ON X-RAY. THE SURGEON DOES NOT HAVE PLANS FOR A SECOND SURGERY. THE IMPACTOR WAS EXAMINED AFTER THE SURGERY HOWEVER IT WAS NOT SUSPECTED THAT ANYTHING HAD BROKEN OFF AT THE TIME OF PROCEDURE AND THEREFORE IT WAS NOT EXAMINED THOROUGHLY FOR BREAKAGE. THE ANCHOR WAS TAKEN FROM FACILITY INVENTORY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED 5/7/2020: THE BENT ANCHOR WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT AND WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 10096488 ↗
Other Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228151Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1,686 reports
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228152Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1,398 reports
- OMNISPAN ORTHOCORD 228142Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE932 reports
- FOOTPRINT 72202901Smith & Nephew, Inc. · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE721 reports
- RIGIDLOOP 232447Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE633 reports
- Arthrex® AR-3636Arthrex, Inc. · Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue624 reports
- OMNISPAN ORTHOCORD 228141Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE609 reports
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228162Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE460 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page