Arthrex® AR-3641SP-1Recalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · SP 2.6 mm Knotless FiberTak Anchor · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Arthrex FiberTak knotless suture anchor is an implant used to fasten soft tissue, often in knee or shoulder surgery. It has 42 adverse event reports, mostly describing the anchor pulling out of bone or the suture tearing or sticking during surgery; most reports say no patient harm occurred. There is 1 reported injury and no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 43
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 43 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867341913), received between Oct 12, 2023 and Sep 11, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 42 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (19 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated19
- Material Split, Cut or Torn8
- Break7
- Physical Resistance/Sticking5
- Defective Device3
- Failure to Advance3
- Positioning Failure2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions38
- Insufficient Information3
- Failure of Implant2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 43 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 11, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50732247 ↗MalfunctionJun 1, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC KNEE SURGERY THE ANCHOR PULLED OUT. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25351813 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A KNEE SURGERY WHILE TIGHTENING THE SUTURE TORE. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24820290 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REMPLISSAGE SURGERY A SUTURE OF THE DEVICES AR-3641SP-1 (LOT: 15535546) TORE. WITH THIS SURGICAL TECHNIQUE/TREATMENT, TWO ANCHORS MUST BE PLACED SIMULTANEOUSLY, THEN CONNECTED TO EACH OTHER AND TIGHTENED. WHEN THE SUTURES WERE TIGHTENED, A SUTURE TEAR OCCURRED. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24399802 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REMPLISSAGE SURGERY A SUTURE OF THE DEVICES AR-3641SP-1 (LOT: 15535546) TORE. WITH THIS SURGICAL TECHNIQUE/TREATMENT, TWO ANCHORS MUST BE PLACED SIMULTANEOUSLY, THEN CONNECTED TO EACH OTHER AND TIGHTENED. WHEN THE SUTURES WERE TIGHTENED, A SUTURE TEAR OCCURRED. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24399708 ↗MalfunctionFeb 16, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LEMAIRE SURGERY THE SUTURE WAS STUCK AND DID NOT MOVE. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24348592 ↗MalfunctionFeb 16, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LEMAIRE SURGERY THE SUTURE WAS STUCK AND DID NOT MOVE. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24348584 ↗MalfunctionFeb 13, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE ANCHOR FELL OUT OF THE BONE DURING SUTURE TIGHTENING. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24335774 ↗MalfunctionFeb 5, 2026Break
ON (B)(6) 2026, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-3641SP-1, SELF-PUNCHING 2.6 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK® ANCHOR, WAS IMPLANTED HOWEVER, WHEN THE REPAIR SUTURE WAS BEING PASSED THROUGH THE KNOTLESS MECHANISM, THE TIGERWIRE SHUTTLING SUTURE'S LOOPED END BROKE OFF LEAVING THE REPAIR SUTURE UNABLE TO BE CONVERTED THROUGH THE ANCHOR. THIS WAS DETECTED DURING A MCL RECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AS A NEW ANCHOR WAS OPENED AND USED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24268060 ↗MalfunctionJan 12, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY, THE DEVICE DIDN'T WORK. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. UPDATE 30-DEC-2025: FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE IMPLANT DID NOT GRIP AND PULLED OUT DURING INSERTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24036904 ↗MalfunctionJan 8, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY THE DEVICE DIDN'T WORK. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. UPDATE 30-DEC-2025: IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR DID NOT DEPLOY CORRECTLY AND THE DEVICE PULLED OUT OF THE PREPARED BONE CHANNEL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24007417 ↗MalfunctionDec 3, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE MODIFIED LEMAIRE LATERAL EXTRA-ARTICULAR TENODESIS THAT THE ANCHOR PULLED OUT DURING TIGHTENING. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23703913 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE SUTURE TORE. DURING THE INSERTION OF THE DEVICE, THE INSERTOR CUT THE ANCHOR. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23380118 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE SUTURE TORE. DURING THE INSERTION OF THE DEVICE, THE INSERTOR CUT THE ANCHOR. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23379928 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE IMPLAND HAS SLIPPED OUT OF THE PREPARED CHANNEL AND DID NOT ANCHOR. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23064724 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MODIFIED LEMAIRE SURGERY THE SHUTTLE SUTURE TORE. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22925646 ↗MalfunctionAug 25, 2025Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY THE THREAD GOT STUCK AND COULD NOT BE MOVED FORWARD. THERE WAS NO POSSIBILITY TO TIGHTEN THE IMPLANT. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22885612 ↗MalfunctionAug 11, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THAT THE IMPLANT HAS SLIPPED OUT OF THE PREPARED CHANNEL. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22774531 ↗MalfunctionJun 16, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LABRUM SURGERY THE ANCHOR OF THE DEVICE BLOCKED PREMATURELY. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22213516 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2025Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF SURGERY THE DEVICE DISLOCATED. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21891708 ↗MalfunctionApr 17, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE ANCHOR DID NOT HOLD IN THE BONE DESPITE PROPER IMPLEMENTATION. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21853885 ↗MalfunctionMar 21, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE IMPLANT HAS SLIPPED OUT OF PREPARED CHANNEL. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21664883 ↗MalfunctionMar 21, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE IMPLANT HAS SLIPPED OUT OF PREPARED CHANNEL. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21664824 ↗MalfunctionMar 20, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR SURGERY THE IMPLANT HAS SLIPPED OUT OF THE PREPARED CHANNEL. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21653331 ↗MalfunctionMar 19, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SHOULDER SURGERY THE SUTURE OF AN AR-3641-1 HAS TORN AND THE AR-3641SP-1 COULD NOT BE PLACED. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21643565 ↗
Other Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228151Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1,686 reports
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228152Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1,398 reports
- OMNISPAN ORTHOCORD 228142Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE932 reports
- FOOTPRINT 72202901Smith & Nephew, Inc. · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE721 reports
- RIGIDLOOP 232447Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE633 reports
- Arthrex® AR-3636Arthrex, Inc. · Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue624 reports
- OMNISPAN ORTHOCORD 228141Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE609 reports
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228162Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE460 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page