Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-3687Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · Knotless Tensionable FiberTak Biceps · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
16
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867398757), received between Mar 4, 2024 and Mar 26, 2026 — classified as 16 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (12 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 3 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 6 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520266
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break12
  • Material Twisted/Bent9
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient10
  • Insufficient Information3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 26, 2026Break; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SUBPECTORAL BICEPS TENODESIS, THE TIPS OF THE INSERTER BROKE OFF. THESE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. PRIOR TO THIS, THE INSERTER HAD BENT SEVERAL TIMES AT THE TIP. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 24698658 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2026Break; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SUBPECTORAL BICEPS TENODESIS, THE TIPS OF THE INSERTER BROKE OFF. THESE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. PRIOR TO THIS, THE INSERTER HAD BENT SEVERAL TIMES AT THE TIP. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 24665178 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2026Break; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SUBPECTORAL BICEPS TENODESIS, THE TIPS OF THE INSERTER BROKE OFF. THESE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. PRIOR TO THIS, THE INSERTER HAD BENT SEVERAL TIMES AT THE TIP. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 24665065 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2026Break; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SUBPECTORAL BICEPS TENODESIS, THE TIPS OF THE INSERTER BROKE OFF. THESE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. PRIOR TO THIS, THE INSERTER HAD BENT SEVERAL TIMES AT THE TIP. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 24664932 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2026Break; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SUBPECTORAL BICEPS TENODESIS, THE TIPS OF THE INSERTER BROKE OFF. THESE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. PRIOR TO THIS, THE INSERTER HAD BENT SEVERAL TIMES AT THE TIP. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 24664686 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2026Break; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SUBPECTORAL BICEPS TENODESIS, THE TIPS OF THE INSERTER BROKE OFF. THESE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. PRIOR TO THIS, THE INSERTER HAD BENT SEVERAL TIMES AT THE TIP. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 24664361 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2025Break; Break

    ON 08/19/2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA PHONE THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR WITH A BICEPS TENODESIS PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025, THREE AR-3687 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK BICEPS DEVICES EXPERIENCED BREAKAGE OF THE METAL INSERTER TINES, WHICH REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WERE NOT RETRIEVED. THE IMPLANTS WERE IMPLANTED AND LEFT IN PLACE. NO OTHER PRODUCTS WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. A 15-MINUTE DELAY WAS REPORTED, THOUGH IT REMAINS UNCERTAIN WHETHER ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS ADMINISTERED. THE AR-3688 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK BICEPS IMPLANT SYSTEM DRILLS PREPARED THE BONE SOCKET FOR IMPLANT INSERTION. BONE QUALITY WAS ASSESSED AS AVERAGE. NO ADDITIONAL SURGERY HAS BEEN PLANNED, AND NO ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED DURING OR FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 23003919 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2025Break; Break

    ON 08/19/2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA PHONE THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR WITH A BICEPS TENODESIS PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025, THREE AR-3687 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK BICEPS DEVICES EXPERIENCED BREAKAGE OF THE METAL INSERTER TINES, WHICH REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WERE NOT RETRIEVED. THE IMPLANTS WERE IMPLANTED AND LEFT IN PLACE. NO OTHER PRODUCTS WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. A 15-MINUTE DELAY WAS REPORTED, THOUGH IT REMAINS UNCERTAIN WHETHER ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS ADMINISTERED. THE AR-3688 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK BICEPS IMPLANT SYSTEM DRILLS PREPARED THE BONE SOCKET FOR IMPLANT INSERTION. BONE QUALITY WAS ASSESSED AS AVERAGE. NO ADDITIONAL SURGERY HAS BEEN PLANNED, AND NO ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED DURING OR FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 23003918 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2025Break; Break

    ON 08/19/2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA PHONE THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR WITH A BICEPS TENODESIS PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025, THREE AR-3687 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK BICEPS DEVICES EXPERIENCED BREAKAGE OF THE METAL INSERTER TINES, WHICH REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WERE NOT RETRIEVED. THE IMPLANTS WERE IMPLANTED AND LEFT IN PLACE. NO OTHER PRODUCTS WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. A 15-MINUTE DELAY WAS REPORTED, THOUGH IT REMAINS UNCERTAIN WHETHER ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS ADMINISTERED. THE AR-3688 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK BICEPS IMPLANT SYSTEM DRILLS PREPARED THE BONE SOCKET FOR IMPLANT INSERTION. BONE QUALITY WAS ASSESSED AS AVERAGE. NO ADDITIONAL SURGERY HAS BEEN PLANNED, AND NO ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED DURING OR FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 23003917 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 1, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BICEPS TENODESIS SURGERY THE DEVICE BROKE. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22687746 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2024Break; Break

    ON (B)(6) 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-3687 BICEPS KNOTLESS FIBERTAK WHITE SUTURE WOULD NOT MOVE WHEN ATTEMPTING THE REDUCE IT. EVENTUALLY, THE SUTURE BROKE UNDER PRESSURE. THE SURGEON ARCHIVED FINAL FIXATION AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE BY ALTERNATIVE MEANS. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A PROCEDURE ON 11/6/2024. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 11/21/2024: THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A SUBPECTORAL BICEPS TENODESIS. THE ANCHOR REMAINED IN THE PATIENT AS A PORTION OF THE SUTURE WAS STILL USABLE. WITH THE USE OF A FREE NEEDLE, THE SUTURE WAS USED TO REPAIR THE TISSUE IN AN OFF-TECHNIQUE MANNER DUE TO THE DEVICE COMPLICATIONS. THE CASE WAS DELAYED TEN MINUTES WITHOUT ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20854589 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SHOULDER / BICEPS TENDON SURGERY THE DEVICE BECAME BENT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SURGERY. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. ***UPDATE DW 20-SEP-2024: FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THE BROKEN FRAGMENT WHICH WAS FOUND DURING THE INVESTIGATION DID NOT BREAK OFF DURING THE SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20333481 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ON 12 SEPTEMBER 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-3687 KNOTLESS TENSIONABLE FIBERTAK BICEPS WAS REPORTED TO HAVE FAILED DURING USE. THIS OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2024 IN ASCOT HOSPITAL DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR WAS IMPLANTED AND WHEN TRYING TO SHUTTLE THE KNOTLESS MECHANISM, THE ANCHOR FAILED AND JAMMED PREMATURELY. IT WAS STUCK AND WAS UNABLE TO DEPLOY. THE SURGEON HAD TO REMOVE ANCHOR AND IMPLANT AN ANOTHER. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING ANOTHER ANCHOR. THERE WAS CASE INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20257704 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 25, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    ON (B)(6) 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-3687 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK INSERTER BENT DURING INSERTION. DUE TO AN UNAVAILABLE AR-3688 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK BICEPS IMPLANT SYSTEM, THE SURGEON USED AN AR-1941DS DISPOSABLE INSTRUMENT KIT, AN AR-2923DT-ST DRILL AND THE AR-3687 KNOTLESS FIBERTAK. THE FIBERTAK ENCOUNTERED FRICTION WHILE GOING DOWN THE DRILL, RESULTING IN THE FIBERTAK INSERTER BENDING. ANOTHER ANCHOR WAS OPENED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19606969 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 29, 2024Break; Break

    ON (B)(6) 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA E-MAIL THAT AN AR-3687 KNOTLESS FIBERTAKS TIP BROKE OFF. THIS OCCURRED DURING AN OPEN SUBPECTORAL BICEPS TENODESIS ON (B)(6) 2024 WHEN THE FORKED TIP BROKE OFF. THE BROKEN FRAGMENT COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 4/9/2024: THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE BROKEN IMPLANT STILL IN THE PATIENT AND THE ANCHOR USED AS DESIGNED. ADDITIONAL X-RAYS WERE NECESSARY TO LOCATE AND CONFIRM THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE INSERTER.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 19201033 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 4, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    ON 02/15/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-3687 KNOTLESS BICEPS FIBERTAK SHAFT BENT UPON INSERTION. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER AR-3687 KNOTLESS BICEPS FIBERTAK IN THE SAME DRILLED BONE HOLE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED 2/21/24: THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS A SUBPEC BICEPS TENODESIS. THE DEVICE BENT AND DID NOT BREAK IN ANY WAY WHILE IN USE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18826721 ↗

Other Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices

All Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page