TRIGEN 71118200Recalls & reported problems
Smith & Nephew, Inc. · SCUPLTOR FLEXIBLE WITH CIRCULAR CONNECTOR · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Smith & Nephew Trigen flexible shaft has 123 adverse event reports, with no deaths and 17 injuries. Most reports describe the shaft breaking or fracturing during nailing or reaming surgery, and surgeons often continued with a backup device. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 123
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 17
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 123 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03596010436528), received between May 28, 2020 and May 18, 2026 — classified as 17 injuries, 106 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (65 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break65
- Fracture49
- Crack9
- Material Twisted/Bent3
- Connection Problem1
- Degraded1
- Material Fragmentation1
- Naturally Worn1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions105
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient11
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
- No Patient Involvement4
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Insufficient Information1
- No Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 123 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 18, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL SURGERY, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR FRACTURED. NO PIECES FELL IN THE WOUND. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, WITH A CHANGE IN SURGICAL TECHNIQUE (SWITCHING TO ANOTHER RETAILER). NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25211778 ↗MalfunctionApr 29, 2026Break; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, BEFORE AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE DISTAL END OF ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR WAS OBSERVED TO HAVE A SLIGHT BEND OR BREAK, WHICH PREVENTED THE REAMER HEADS FROM ATTACHING AS DESIGNED. THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING AN EQUIVALENT S+N BACK UP. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25024301 ↗MalfunctionFeb 13, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR FRACTURED WHILE REAMING AND REMOVING INSTRUMENT FROM BONE. NOTHING FELL INSIDE THE WOUND. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY, USING AN EQUIVALENT SMITH & NEPHEW BACK-UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24332206 ↗MalfunctionFeb 10, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A TRIGEN IM NAILING SURGERY, DURING REAMING ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR APPEARED TO HAVE SNAPPED THROUGH THE LAST SEGMENT ON THE REAMER SHAFT. NO PIECES FELL INSIDE OF THE PATIENT-S WOUND. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY, USING THE SAME DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24305954 ↗MalfunctionJan 9, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A NAIL SURGERY, TWO (2) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING AN EQUIVALENT S+N BACK-UP. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24023676 ↗MalfunctionDec 16, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, WHEN THE SURGEON WAS REAMING, THE TOP OF ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR SNAPPED OFF. NO PIECES FELL INSIDE THE WOUND. ALL PIECES WERE RECOVERED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, AFTER NO DELAY, USING AN EQUIVALENT S+N BACKUP. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23815781 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A NAIL SURGERY, A FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKEN DURING NORMAL USE. THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING AN EQUIVALENT S+N BACK- UP. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23699856 ↗MalfunctionNov 20, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING PROCEDURE, WHILE ATTEMPTING TO UNSCREW THE THREADED GUIDE, DUE TO THE PATIENT¿S BONE BEING VERY RIGID AND DENSE, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT WITH CIR CONNECTOR BROKE DURING REAMING. THE BROKEN PIECES WERE COMPLETELY REMOVED WITH FORCEPS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT DELAY USING THE SAME DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23610452 ↗MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, TWO (2) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, AFTER ANY DELAY, WITH AN EQUIVALENT S+N BACK UP. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23285759 ↗MalfunctionSep 10, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TRAUMA SURGERY ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR WAS BROKEN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY USING A S+N BACK-UP DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23016793 ↗MalfunctionJul 30, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, WHILE PASSING THE FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR INTO THE CANAL FOR THE THIRD TIME, IT FRACTURED AT THE DISTAL END. NO BROKEN PIECES FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY SURGICAL DELAY USING THE SAME DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22669069 ↗MalfunctionJun 30, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE DURING USE. NO PIECES FELL INSIDE THE WOUND. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING A S+N BACK-UP DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22355162 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, WHILE REAMING THE CANAL, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR WAS NOTICED TO BE FRACTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY, WITH A S+N BACK-UP DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22234948 ↗MalfunctionMay 15, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE IN HALF. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY, WITH A S+N BACK-UP DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22024842 ↗MalfunctionMay 8, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, WHILE SURGEON WAS REAMING, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE WHERE IT ATTACHED TO THE DRILL. NOTHING FELL INTO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING THE SAME DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21990779 ↗MalfunctionApr 10, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR SNAPPED WHILST IN USE AT THE JUNCTION WITH THE REAMER HEAD. NOTHING WAS LEFT INSIDE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY, WITH THE SAME DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21820156 ↗MalfunctionMar 7, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, WHEN THE FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR WAS REMOVED IT WAS FOUND TO HAVE FRACTURED IN ITS DISTAL PORTION, BUT WITHOUT BEING DISASSEMBLED FROM THE DEVICE, THEN NO PIECE FELL INTO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING THE SAME DEVICE. PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED AS CONSEQUENCE OF THIS PROBLEM. THE PATIENT'S HEALTH CONDITION IS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21548047 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE AT THE CONNECTION POINT. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING A S+N BACK-UP DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21337327 ↗MalfunctionJan 7, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING SURGERY, THE FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE WHILE BEING USED. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING A S+N BACK-UP DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21092212 ↗MalfunctionDec 3, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN ORIF SURGERY, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR APPEARED TO HAVE BROKEN. NO PIECES FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY USING AN UNKNOWN COMPETITOR DEVICE, AND NO INJURIES WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20838867 ↗MalfunctionOct 29, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING OSTEOSYNTHESIS SURGERY, WHILE THE PATIENT'S CANAL WAS BEING REAMED, 0.5 AT A TIME, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR FRACTURED IN ITS PROXIMAL PART, AS THE BONE BEGAN TO PUT UP A LOT OF RESISTANCE. NO PIECE FELL INTO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING THE SAME DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20558353 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY, ONE (1) FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE DURING USE IN THE SHAFT. NOTHING LEFT IN PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING A S+N BACK-UP DEVICE. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20523994 ↗MalfunctionOct 3, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE OSTEOSYNTHESIS PROCEDURE, WHEN THE MEDULLARY CANAL WAS BEING REAMED, THE FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR FRACTURED AT THE TIP. IT IS UNKNOWN IF ANY PIECES FELL INTO THE PATIENT. THERE WAS A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY AND THE PROCEDURE WAS FINISHED USING A SMITH & NEPHEW BACK UP. PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20360419 ↗MalfunctionSep 19, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING THE OSTEOSYNTHESIS PROCEDURE, THE FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE IN ITS PROXIMAL PART WHERE IT CONNECTS TO THE HUDSON ANCHOR. NO PIECES FELL INTO THE PATIENT. SURGERY WAS PERFORMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, WITH THE SAME DEVICE. PATIENT'S HEALTH CONDITION IS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20260714 ↗MalfunctionSep 5, 2024Break; Crack; Break; Crack
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY (OSTEOSYNTHESIS PROCEDURE), A FLEXIBLE SHAFT W/CIR CONNECTOR BROKE. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABLE TO BE COMPLETED WITH THE SAME DEVICE. SURGERY WAS NOT DELAYED. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20152130 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, HEMI-, HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMENTED devices
- DJO SURGICAL 509-02-032Encore Medical, L.P. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, HEMI-, HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMENTED364 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130790036Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, HEMI-, HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMENTED171 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130770018Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, HEMI-, HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMENTED159 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-02-432Encore Medical, L.P. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, HEMI-, HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMENTED119 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130738206Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, HEMI-, HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMENTED116 reports
- COMPREHENSIVE SHOULDER SYSTEM 113633Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, HEMI-, HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMENTED2 recalls4 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130742206Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, HEMI-, HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMENTED99 reports
- GLOBAL UNITE 1100-12-100Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, HEMI-, HUMERAL, METALLIC UNCEMENTED1 recall29 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page