BIOSURE 72202272Recalls & reported problems
Smith & Nephew, Inc. · BIOSURE PK SCREW 9 MM X 25 MM · Class 2
All models of BIOSURE (68)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03596010621634), received between Feb 11, 2021 and May 31, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break6
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Nonstandard Device1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 31, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN ACL PROCEDURE, THE BIOSURE ANCHOR BROKE DURING IMPLANTATION. ALL BROKEN PIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT USING TWEEZERS. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITH A NON SIGNIFICANT DELAY, USING AN EQUIVALENT S+N BACK UP. BACK UP DEVICE WAS USED IN THE ORIGINALLY DRILLED BONE HOLE, THERE WAS NO VOID LEFT IN THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25344061 ↗MalfunctionMay 31, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN ACL PROCEDURE, THE BIOSURE ANCHOR BROKE DURING IMPLANTATION. ALL BROKEN PIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT USING TWEEZERS. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITH A NON SIGNIFICANT DELAY, USING AN EQUIVALENT S+N BACK-UP. BACK UP DEVICE WAS USED IN THE ORIGINALLY DRILLED BONE HOLE, THERE WAS NO VOID LEFT IN THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25344019 ↗MalfunctionAug 18, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE THE BISOURE SCREW BROKE, THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED USING A SMITH AND NEPHEW BACK-UP DEVICE, IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY AND NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22825058 ↗InjuryNov 17, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON REGISTRY REVIEW 2021 NEW ZEALAND ACL REGISTRY IMPLANT REPORT, AN UNKNOWN AMOUNT OF PATIENTS REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY AFTER AN ACL PROCEDURE USING BIOSURE PK SCREW DEVICES. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW WERE THE EVENTS TREATED/RESOLVED. PATIENTS OUTCOME IS UNKNOWN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15819207 ↗InjuryOct 31, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPY, A BIOSURE PK´S SCREW BROKE WHILE IT WAS BEING TWIST IN. SURGERY RESUMED AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY, WITH A BACK-UP DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15700752 ↗InjuryMar 8, 2022Break; Nonstandard Device; Break; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ACL PROCEDURE, THE BIOSURE SCREW SURFACE WAS TOO SMALL AND COULD NOT FIX THE TENDON. BROKEN PIECES FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WERE RETRIEVED WITH TWEEZERS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NON-SIGNIFICANT SURGICAL DELAY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE IN THE ORIGINALLY DRILLED BONE HOLE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13691518 ↗InjuryFeb 11, 2021Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CL RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY, THE BIOSURE SCREW BROKE WHEN SCREW-IN. BROKEN PIECES WERE REMOVED WITH TWEEZERS. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT DELAY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE. NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11317809 ↗
Other FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228151Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1,686 reports
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228152Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1,398 reports
- OMNISPAN ORTHOCORD 228142Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE932 reports
- FOOTPRINT 72202901Smith & Nephew, Inc. · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE721 reports
- RIGIDLOOP 232447Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE633 reports
- Arthrex® AR-3636Arthrex, Inc. · Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue624 reports
- OMNISPAN ORTHOCORD 228141Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE609 reports
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228162Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE460 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page