Mobi-C® Plug & Fit US MB3575Recalls & reported problems
LDR Spine Usa, Inc. · Total Cervical Disc Replacement System: Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Mobi-C Plug & Fit US (13)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Mobi-C cervical disc implant is a synthetic replacement for a neck disc. The 31 adverse event reports mostly describe the implant coming apart or shifting out of position during or after surgery, sometimes requiring revision surgery, along with ongoing pain and allergic reactions. Reports mention 12 injuries and no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 31
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 12
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 31 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03662663000154), received between May 3, 2019 and May 4, 2026 — classified as 12 injuries, 19 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (12 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component12
- Misassembled4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Disconnection3
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Migration2
- Positioning Problem2
- Biocompatibility1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient10
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient6
- Pain2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Erythema1
- Extraskeletal ossification1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 31 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 4, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN TAMPING IN A MOBI-C IMPLANT INTRA-OPERATIVELY, IT DISASSEMBLED. THERE WAS ANOTHER IMPLANT AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25074244 ↗InjuryOct 29, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING PAIN WITH TWO-LEVEL MOBI-C IMPLANTS AT C5/6 AND C6/7 APPROXIMATELY 6.5 YEARS POST-OPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT HAS USED MEDICATION AND PHYSICAL THERAPY AND STILL EXPERIENCES PAIN. FOLLOW-UP X-RAYS AND MRIS WERE INCONCLUSIVE, AND THE SURGEON SUGGESTED POSSIBLE IMPLANT REMOVAL, HOWEVER THE PATIENT DOES NOT WANT TO DO SO UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. THE PATIENT TESTED NEGATIVE FOR ALLERGY TO MOBI-C COMPONENTS. ANOTHER X-RAY WAS TAKEN AND SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE CALCIFICATION OVER ONE OF THE IMPLANTS AND NO MOVEMENT OF IT. THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO CONSULT THEIR DOCTOR TO DETERMINE NEXT STEPS. THIS IS REPORT TWO OF TWO FOR THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 23417424 ↗InjuryOct 29, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Osseointegration Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking
A PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING PAIN WITH TWO-LEVEL MOBI-C IMPLANTS AT C5/6 AND C6/7 APPROXIMATELY 6.5 YEARS POST-OPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT HAS USED MEDICATION AND PHYSICAL THERAPY AND STILL EXPERIENCES PAIN. FOLLOW-UP X-RAYS AND MRIS WERE INCONCLUSIVE, AND THE SURGEON SUGGESTED POSSIBLE IMPLANT REMOVAL, HOWEVER THE PATIENT DOES NOT WANT TO DO SO UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. THE PATIENT TESTED NEGATIVE FOR ALLERGY TO MOBI-C COMPONENTS. ANOTHER X-RAY WAS TAKEN AND SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE CALCIFICATION OVER ONE OF THE IMPLANTS AND NO MOVEMENT OF IT. THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO CONSULT THEIR DOCTOR TO DETERMINE NEXT STEPS. THIS IS REPORT ONE OF TWO FOR THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Extraskeletal ossification; Pain
MAUDE report 23417422 ↗InjuryJul 12, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT FELT A FEELING OF ELECTRICITY RUN THROUGH HIS NECK AND HIS ARM FELL TO HIS SIDE. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED IN WHICH A MOBI-C DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A FUSION CAGE. THE SURGEON FOUND THAT THERE WAS A FRACTURED PIECE OF C7 BONE UNDER THE INFERIOR MOBI-C PLATE AND STATED "IT WAS NOT THE IMPLANT THAT FAILED, IT WAS THE PATIENT." HOWEVER, REVIEW OF THE X-RAYS BY THE MANUFACTURER IDENTIFIED THAT THE INFERIOR PLATE HAD MIGRATED ANTERIORLY.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 19735400 ↗InjuryApr 25, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SURGEON CONDUCTED A REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE A MOBI-C CERVICAL DISC DUE TO STRUCTURALLY DEFECTIVE NOTCHES IN THE POLY CORE THAT WORE SO THEY WERE 2X THE NORMAL SIZE RESULTING IN A 30% SPONDYLOLISTHESIS. THE IMPLANT WAS REPLACED WITH A COMPETITIVE DISC.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 19187931 ↗InjuryMar 22, 2024Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO CONVERT TO A FUSION FOLLOWING A MOBI-C IMPLANT THAT DEVELOPED SUBSIDENCE WITHIN THE DISC SPACE. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18965123 ↗InjuryFeb 13, 2024Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE TWO MOBI-C DEVICES AFTER THE PATIENT WAS SHOWING SIGNS OF AN ALLERGIC REACTION. ALTHOUGH THE PATIENT IS NOT ALLERGIC TO NICKEL, AN ALLERGY TO THE MOBI-C WAS CONFIRMED WHEN THE DOCTOR TAPED A DEMO IMPLANT TO THE PATIENT'S ARM, AND WITHIN 30 MINUTES, THE SITE WAS TURNING RED AND ITCHING. THIS IS REPORT TWO OF TWO FOR THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 18699624 ↗MalfunctionOct 6, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE THE SURGEON WAS ADJUSTING THE POSITION OF A MOBI-C IMPLANT IN THE DISC SPACE, THE DEVICE DISASSEMBLED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE WITHOUT PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17890344 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MOBI-C DEVICE CAME APART DURING IMPACTION INTO THE DISC SPACE WITHOUT RELEASING WITH THE INSERTER. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER MOBI-C IMPLANT WITH NO IMPACT ON THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17389815 ↗InjuryNov 19, 2022Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MOBI-C IMPLANT DISASSOCIATED WHERE THE UPPER ENDPLATE RETROLISTHESED AND THE IMPLANT KICKED INTO HYPERLORDOSIS. THERE ARE PLANS TO PERFORM A REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE THE MOBI-C AND CONVERT IT TO A FUSION. THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO HAVE NECK PAIN.
Patient problems: Neck Pain
MAUDE report 15831021 ↗MalfunctionNov 11, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MOBI-C IMPLANT DETACHED FROM THE PEEK CARTRIDGE WHILE THE SURGEON WAS ROTATING THE IMPLANT INTRAOPERATIVELY. IT WAS REMOVED AND ANOTHER MOBI-C IMPLANT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15780530 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2022Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT DEVELOPED OSTEOLYSIS AFTER A LEVEL MOBI-C PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON IS CURRENTLY MONITORING THIS PATIENT AND NO PLANS FOR REVISION HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AT THIS TIME. THIS IS REPORT ONE OF TWO FOR THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 14677002 ↗MalfunctionMar 28, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MOBI-C IMPLANT DISASSEMBLED DURING IMPLANTATION IN THE DISC SPACE. IMAGING TAKEN AFTER SHOWED IT WAS INSTALLED SHOWED THE INFERIOR PLATE WAS ROTATED 90 DEGREES IN-SITU. WHEN THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, THE SUPERIOR PLATE WAS STILL ATTACHED TO THE CARTRIDGE, HOWEVER THE POLY CORE AND INFERIOR PLATE WERE NOT ATTACHED BUT WERE SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED. ANOTHER IMPLANT WAS OPENED, LOADED ON THE SAME INSERTER, AND IMPLANTED WITHOUT COMPLICATION. THERE WERE NO PATIENT IMPACTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13932350 ↗MalfunctionMar 8, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON INTRODUCTION OF THE MOBI-C IMPLANT INTO THE DISC SPACE C6-7, THE IMPLANT CAME APART WHEN IT HAD BEEN IMPACTED 2 TIMES. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW IMPLANT TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT PATIENT IMPACTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13690611 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN IMPLANT DISASSEMBLED DURING SURGERY. DURING INSTALLATION, THE SURGEON WANTED TO MAKE AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE IMPLANT POSITION SO HE PROCEEDED TO PULL THE IMPLANT OUT. THE INFERIOR PLATE AND POLY CORE REMAINED IN THE DISC SPACE WHILE THE SUPERIOR PLATE WAS REMOVED WITH THE CARTRIDGE AND INSERTER. THE INFERIOR PLATE AND POLY CORE WERE REMOVED FROM THE DISC SPACE AND ANOTHER MOBI-C WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT PATIENT IMPACTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11948224 ↗MalfunctionFeb 4, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MOBI-C DEVICE DISASSEMBLED WHILE BEING REMOVED FROM THE DISC SPACE. IT WAS DECIDED THE DEVICE WAS TOO BIG FOR THE PATIENT, SO IT WAS BEING REMOVED SO A SMALLER DEVICE COULD BE INSTALLED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT IMPACTS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 11281391 ↗InjuryNov 25, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT HAS SUSPECTED INFECTION AFTER UNDERGOING A MOBI-C PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON NOTICED THE PATIENT'S NECK WAS RED AROUND THE SURGICAL INCISION. NO FURTHER PATIENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Erythema; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10906889 ↗MalfunctionOct 20, 2020Misassembled During Installation; Misassembled During Installation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGERY, THE IMPLANT DISASSEMBLED WHEN THE SURGEON WENT TO REMOVE IT FROM THE INSERTER. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW IMPLANT WITHOUT ANY IMPACT ON THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10705513 ↗MalfunctionJul 29, 2019Malposition of Device; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Malposition of Device; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, UPON INSERTING THE IMPLANT INTO THE DISC SPACE, THE TOP PLATE PIVOTED INTO FLEXION WHILE STILL ON THE INSERTER. AS THE SURGEON DID NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE LEAVING THE IMPLANT IN THIS POSITION, IT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW IMPLANT. NO PATIENT OR SURGICAL IMPACT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8835402 ↗MalfunctionJul 18, 2019Disconnection; Fracture; Disconnection; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PEEK CARTRIDGE WAS BROKEN WHEN THE PACKAGE WAS OPENED. THE IMPLANT NEVER TOUCHED THE PATIENT AND A SECOND IMPLANT WAS OPENED AND USED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. NO PATIENT IMPACTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8801479 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2019Positioning Failure; Disconnection; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Positioning Failure; Disconnection; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, THE IMPLANT DISASSEMBLED WHILE HALFWAY IN THE DISC SPACE WHEN THE SURGEON WENT TO ADJUST THE POSITION. ANOTHER IMPLANT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT IMPACTS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8770998 ↗MalfunctionJun 21, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE IMPLANT DISASSEMBLED. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH AN ALTERNATE TO COMPLETE THE CASE WITHOUT REPORTED PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8721208 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2019Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem
MOBI-C P&F US : POSITION INCORRECT POST-OP. IT WAS REPORTED THAT SALES REP. RECEIVED A TEXT MESSAGE FROM SURGEON WITH IMAGES OF MOBI-C IMPLANT THAT APPEARS TO DISPLACE WITH FLEXION. HE SAID PATIENT HAD NO CLINICAL ISSUES TO DATE. ASKED IF HE WOULD GET SOME CORPORATE FEEDBACK ON IMAGES. PATIENT IS ASYMPTOMATIC.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8707163 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2019Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem
MOBI-C P&F US : POSITION INCORRECT POST-OP. IT WAS REPORTED THAT SALES REP. RECEIVED A TEXT MESSAGE FROM SURGEON WITH IMAGES OF MOBI-C IMPLANT THAT APPEARS TO DISPLACE WITH FLEXION. HE SAID PATIENT HAD NO CLINICAL ISSUES TO DATE. ASKED IF HE WOULD GET SOME CORPORATE FEEDBACK ON IMAGES. PATIENT IS ASYMPTOMATIC.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8707151 ↗MalfunctionJun 12, 2019Misassembled; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Misassembled; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT DISASSEMBLED WHEN THE SCRUB TECH ATTEMPTED TO DETACH AND REATTACH TO THE INSERTER. AN ALTERNATE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE WITHOUT REPORTED PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8690656 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc devices
- Prodisc C SK PDSM5Centinel Spine, LLC · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc2 recalls4 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall12 reports
- Prodisc C 09.820.055SCentinel Spine, LLC · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall9 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall4 reports
- Prodisc C SK PDSXL5Centinel Spine, LLC · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall3 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall3 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall3 reports
- Simplify® Cervical Artificial DiscNuvasive, Inc. · Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page