Skip to content

Humelock Cemented Shoulder Prosthesis 106-4316Recalls & reported problems

Fx Solutions · Humelock Cemented Shoulder Prosthesis, CENTERED HEAD CrCo 43x16 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Humelock Cemented Shoulder Prosthesis (7)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03701037300404), received between May 27, 2021 and May 21, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Output Problem” (1 report).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K111097); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • Joint Dislocation2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Medical device site infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 21, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO AN INFECTION ON (B)(6) 2026. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2025. A HEAD AND A DOUBLE TAPER WERE EXPLANTED. A HEAD AND A DOUBLE TAPER WERE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25242124 ↗
  • InjuryMay 22, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO A PAIN ON (B)(6) 2025. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2024.A CENTRED HEAD AND A DOUBLE TAPER WERE EXPLANTED. A RESURFACING GLENOIDE, A DOUBLE TAPER, A CENTRED HEAD WERE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 22068334 ↗
  • InjuryJan 5, 2022Output Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO DISMANTLING, APPROXIMATELY 3 WEEKS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED CENTERED HEAD (43/16) AND IMPLANTED CENTERED HEAD 43/16.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 13168711 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE EVENT WAS A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO DISLOCATION THAT OCCURED APPROXIMATELY A MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE PRIMARY SURGERY USED THE EASYTECH ANATOMICAL SYSTEM. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE 43X16MM CENTERED HEAD, THE +0MM DOUBLE TAPER AND THE ANATOMICAL GLENOID. THEN, HE CONVERTED ANATOMICAL CONFIGURATION TO A REVERSE CONFIGURATION BY IMPLANTING A Ø24 BASEPLATE, A +10MM POST EXTENSION, A Ø36 ECCENTRIC GLENOSPHERE, A 135/145 Ø36/+3 HUMERAL CUP AND ASSOCIATED SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 12452019 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE EVENT WAS A REVISION SURGERY TO CONVERT THE HEMI IN FULL ANATOMICAL PROSTHESIS DUE TO PATIENT HEALTH STATE. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE DOUBLE TAPER AND THE 43*16 CENTERED HEAD. THEN HE IMPLANTED A NEW DOUBLE TAPER, A NEW 43*16 CENTERED HEAD AND A SIZE S ANATOMICAL GLENOID.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12056167 ↗
  • InjuryMay 27, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE EVENT WAS A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO DISLOCATION APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE PRIMAR SURGERY USED THE EASYTECH ANATOMICAL SYSTEM. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE 43 X 16 CENTERED HEAD AND THE +0MM DOUBLE TAPER. IT WAS REPLACED BY A REVERSED CONFIGURATION. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED A Ø24 BASEPLATE, A Ø36 CENTERED GLENOSPHERE, A Ø36/+3 135/145 HUMERAL CUP AND ASSOCIATED SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 11892151 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K111097. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2468-2018 · Jun 4, 2018 · Terminated
    Fx SOLUTIONS CENTERED HEAD CoCr 50x19, REF 106-5019 Product Usage: Device is designed to produce and deliver proton beam for the treatment of patients with localized tumors and ot
  • Z-2469-2018 · Jun 4, 2018 · Terminated
    Fx SOLUTIONS OFFSET HEAD CoCr 50x20, REF 106-5000 Product Usage: Device is designed to produce and deliver proton beam for the treatment of patients with localized tumors and othe

Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Hemi-, Humeral, Metallic Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Shoulder, Hemi-, Humeral, Metallic Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page