AESCULAP FB805RRecalls & reported problems
Aesculap AG · FINOCHIETTO-BURFORD Rib Spreader, complete set, 8 3/4", (220 mm), width: 300 mm, opening width: 220 mm, consisting of FB806R, FB807R, non-sterile, reusable, Set · Class 1
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04038653157945), received between Feb 11, 2021 and Feb 11, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Jam” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Jam2
Patient problems
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 11, 2021Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam
THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AAG REFERENCE (B)(4).
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 11318037 ↗InjuryFeb 11, 2021Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam
IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A FINOCHIETTO-BURFORD RIB SPREADER (PART # (B)(4)) WAS USED DURING A THORACIC SURGERY PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO OPEN OR CLOSE THE CHEST RETRACTOR AFTER IT WAS PLACED INSIDE THE PATIENT. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A MAJOR BLEED OF THE PULMONARY ARTERY, AND BECAUSE THE DEVICE WAS NOT ABLE TO BE OPENED, THE SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO FULLY ACCESS THE BLEED SITE TO SEW THE WOUND. AFTER APPROXIMATELY FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES OF STRUGGLING WITH THE DEVICE, IT WAS ABLE TO BE FREED AND REMOVED. THE SURGEON WAS THEN ABLE TO ADDRESS THE BLEED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVICE WAS NOTED AS BEING APPROXIMATELY TWO (2) YEARS OLD. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS NOTED AS BEING "FINE" AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE. ADDITIONALLY, THE REPORTER CONFIRMED THAT THE PATIENT WAS STABLE POST OPERATIVELY. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AAG REFERENCE (B)(4).
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 11317958 ↗
Other RETRACTOR devices
- Endo Paddle Retract 173046Covidien LP · RETRACTOR56 reports
- Omni-Tract® 4040Integra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall3 reports
- RadiaLux™ 50-101-1Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- Omni-Tract® 11275Integra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- CHARNLEY 9620-04-000Depuy International Ltd · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- NA 2176-10-000Depuy (Ireland) · RETRACTOR51 reports
- Fathom MR2-102050Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall1 report
- Omni-Tract® 3104RIntegra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page