Skip to content

AESCULAP PL536RRecalls & reported problems

Aesculap AG · CHALLENGER TI Clip Applier (Shaft Only), multi-fire, (370 mm), diam. 10 mm, to be used with: PL510R, PL569T · Class 2

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04038653241149), received between Oct 29, 2022 and Dec 27, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unintended Ejection” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unintended Ejection2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 27, 2023Unintended Ejection; Unintended Ejection

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A SHAFT COMPL.D:10MM L:370MM (PART# PL536R) WAS USED DURING A BARIATRIC GASTRIC BYPASS ON DECEMBER 06 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT THE CLIP APPLIER SUCCESSFULLY FIRED AND CLIPPED TWICE. FURTHER USE OF THE CLIP APPLIER CAUSED THE CLIPS TO BACK UP IN CARTRIDGE. REPORTEDLY THE STAFF TRIED AGAIN TO ENGAGE THE CLIP APPLIER AND 3 TITANIUM CLIPS DROPPED INTO THE PATIENT. THE PIECES WERE RETRIEVED DURING SURGERY AND REMOVED FROM INSIDE OF PATIENT. A DELAY OF TWENTY MINUTES WAS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AIC REFERENCE (B)(4). ASSOCIATED MEDWATCH REPORTS: (B)(4) (2916714-2023-00125) PL520R, (B)(4) (2916714-2023-00126) PL579T.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18406209 ↗
  • InjuryOct 29, 2022Unintended Ejection; Unintended Ejection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH PL536R - SHAFT COMPL.D:10MM L:370MM. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION, THE CARTRIDGE CONTAINER FELL INTO THE PATIENT'S CAVITY INTRAOPERATIVELY. AN ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS NECESSARY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AAG REFERENCE (B)(4). INVOLVED COMPONENTS PL520R - CHALLENGER TI-P HANDLE (9610612-2021-00613) (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15695557 ↗

Other Endoscopic tissue approximation device devices

All Endoscopic tissue approximation device devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.