E-LINE 8702517Recalls & reported problems
Richard Wolf GmbH · URETERORENOSCOPE 5° 6/7.5FR WL 330MM semi-rigid, with straight ocular lens, working channel 1x4 (2x2.2)Fr, atraumatic distal tip, TL 458mm, without flushing ports, fiber image carrier, reusable · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04055207063309), received between May 31, 2022 and May 31, 2022 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- Laceration(s)2
- Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem2
- Urethral Stenosis/Stricture2
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 31, 2022Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED TO RICHARD WOLF THAT "WHEN SCOPE AND BASKET WERE BEING REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT, PART OF THE URETER WAS REMOVED TOO." WILL THE DEVICE BE RETURNED? YES. WAS THE DEVICE BEING USED ON A PATIENT WHEN THE REPORTING ISSUE OCCURRED? YES. WAS THERE ANY INJURY OR ILLNESS TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE? YES. WAS THERE ANY INJURY OR ILLNESS TO ANY OTHER PERSONNEL DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE? NO. DID THE ISSUE CAUSE A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED? NO. DID THE DELAY PUT THE PATIENT AT RISK? UNKNOWN. WAS THERE A SIMILAR BACK-UP DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR USE? YES. WAS THE SCHEDULED PROCEDURE COMPLETED? YES. ADDITIONAL DETAILS ABOUT THE ADVERSE EVENT: WHAT IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT? PATIENT IS BEING FOLLOWED UP AT (B)(6). WAS THE URETER REPAIRED? NO, URETER WAS NOT REPAIRED. IT WAS DISSECTED IN TWO PLACES. PATIENT CURRENTLY HAS A NEPHROTUBE AND IS WAITING FOR FOLLOW UP AT (B)(6). WHAT KIND OF PROCEDURE WAS IT? URETEROSCOPY, STONE REMOVAL WITH LASER AND BASKETING. WAS THERE ANY PROBLEM AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROCEDURE WHEN THEY LED THE SCOPE INTO THE URETER? NO. WAS IT ALREADY TIGHT? AS THE DR WAS INSERTING THE SCOPE IT WENT IN WITH NO PROBLEMS. SHE NOTICED
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Laceration(s); Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem; Urethral Stenosis/Stricture
MAUDE report 14552168 ↗InjuryMay 31, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED TO RICHARD WOLF THAT "WHEN SCOPE AND BASKET WERE BEING REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT, PART OF THE URETER WAS REMOVED TOO. WILL THE DEVICE BE RETURNED? YES. WAS THE DEVICE BEING USED ON A PATIENT WHEN THE REPORTING ISSUE OCCURRED? YES. WAS THERE ANY INJURY OR ILLNESS TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE? YES. WAS THERE ANY INJURY OR ILLNESS TO ANY OTHER PERSONNEL DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE? NO. DID THE ISSUE CAUSE A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED? NO. DID THE DELAY PUT THE PATIENT AT RISK? UNKNOWN. WAS THERE A SIMILAR BACK-UP DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR USE? YES. WAS THE SCHEDULED PROCEDURE COMPLETED? YES. ADDITIONAL DETAILS ABOUT THE ADVERSE EVENT: WHAT IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT? PATIENT IS BEING FOLLOWED UP AT U OF M. WAS THE URETER REPAIRED? NO, URETER WAS NOT REPAIRED. IT WAS DISSECTED IN TWO PLACES. PATIENT CURRENTLY HAS A NEPHROTUBE AND IS WAITING FOR FOLLOW UP AT U OF M. WHAT KIND OF PROCEDURE WAS IT? URETEROSCOPY, STONE REMOVAL WITH LASER AND BASKETING. WAS THERE ANY PROBLEM AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROCEDURE WHEN THEY LED THE SCOPE INTO THE URETER? NO. WAS IT ALREADY TIGHT? AS THE DR WAS INSERTING THE SCOPE IT WENT IN WITH NO PROBLEMS. SHE NOTICED A
Patient problems: Laceration(s); Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem; Urethral Stenosis/Stricture
MAUDE report 14552095 ↗
Other Ureteroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid devices
- ENDOEYE FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LTF-S190-10Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Ureteroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid1 recall1,125 reports
- URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS URF-V2Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Ureteroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid2 recalls397 reports
- URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS URF-V2ROlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Ureteroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid1 recall305 reports
- URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE OLYMPUS URF-P6ROlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Ureteroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid2 recalls190 reports
- URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE OLYMPUS URF-P6Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Ureteroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid2 recalls170 reports
- ENDOEYE FLEX 3D DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LTF-190-10-3DOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Ureteroscope And Accessories, Flexible/Rigid186 reports
- URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE OLYMPUS URF-P7ROlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Ureteroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid1 recall121 reports
- n.a. 091279-01Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · Ureteroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid118 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.