Restoration 6276-1-127Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Modular Hip System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Restoration (86)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540641175), received between Sep 11, 2018 and Oct 23, 2020 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Degraded” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Degraded1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Loss of Osseointegration1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- Injury2
- Hip Fracture1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Metal Related Pathology1
- Osteolysis1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 23, 2020Degraded; Loss of Osseointegration; Degraded; Loss of Osseointegration
THIS PI IS FOR REVISION1. I HAD THA REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE STEM WAS REPLACED WITH A STRYKER RESTORATION MODULAR ONE. THE 28 MM CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD WAS REPLACED WITH A COCR HEAD. HIP, GROIN, AND THIGH PAIN CONTINUED. ON (B)(6) 2019, I WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A STRESS FRACTURE AT THE TIP OF THE PROSTHETIC STEM. ON (B)(6) 2020, I HAD A BONE GRAFT TO REPAIR THE FRACTURE. A CLOUDY MILKY YELLOW FLUID ALONG WITH METAL DEBRIS WAS DISCOVERED IN THE HIP JOINT. ALSO, THERE WAS OSTEOLYSIS IN THE PROXIMAL FEMORAL FEMUR. THE ACETABULAR HAD OVERHANGING SCAR TISSUE AND BONE. THE TRUNION HAD STRIPE WEAR INDICATING IMPINGEMENT AND LIKELY SOURCE OF THE METALLOSIS. THE 28 MM FEMORAL HEAD WAS REPLACED WITH A 40MM COCR HEAD. SYMPTOMS OF METALLOSIS CONTINUE. FDA SAFETY REPORT ID# (B)(4). UPDATE: AS PER THE PATIENT, HE HAD A LEFT THA ON (B)(6) 2016. HE STARTED TO EXPERIENCE PAIN AT THE END OF (B)(6) 2016. THE PATIENT HAD A BONE SCAN DON ON (B)(6) 2017 (APPROX.) WHICH INDICATED INFECTION/IMPLANT LOOSENING. NO TREATMENT WAS GIVEN TO THE PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2017 (APPROX.) HE WAS PLACED ON ORAL ANTIBIOTICS FOR 30 DAYS DUE TO INFECTION. ON (B)(6) 2017 X-RAYS CONFIRMED LOOSENING AND THE PATIENT WAS REV
Patient problems: Hip Fracture; Inadequate Osseointegration; Metal Related Pathology; Osteolysis; Pain
MAUDE report 10731082 ↗InjuryNov 9, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISASSOCIATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE STEM. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE RING ON THE COMPETITOR CONSTRAINED LINER WAS FOUND BROKEN. NO TRAUMA WAS REPORTED TO THE REP. THE PROXIMAL STEM BODY AND METAL HEAD WERE REVISED TO A STRYKER PROXIMAL STEM BODY, FEMORAL HEAD, AND LINER.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8055768 ↗InjurySep 11, 2018Migration; Migration
OPERATIVE SIDE: RIGHT. THE PROXIMAL CONE BODY IMPLANT WAS NOT FULLY SEATED FROM THE (B)(6) /2018 SURGERY. DOCTOR REMOVED THE LOOSE CONE BODY AND PREPARED FOR A REPLACEMENT CONE BODY. REMOVED IMPLANTS: 1. CONE BODY, 2. BIOLOX HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT THE DISTAL STEM WAS NOT ACTUALLY REVISED AND REMAINS IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 7864712 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish devices
- Arcos Modular Revision Hip System 11-301310Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish1 recall9 reports
- Arcos Modular Revision Hip System 11-301342Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish1 recall4 reports
- Tritanium 502-03-52DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish39 reports
- V40 Head 6260-5-332Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish12 reports
- EXETER 0580-1-443Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish11 reports
- V40 Head 6260-9-032Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish11 reports
- Trident 509-02-56EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish10 reports
- Taperloc Complete Primary Femoral 51-104180Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish9 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page