X SERIES 610-0121001-36Recalls & reported problems
Zoll Medical Corporation · Defibrillator ,MAIN ASSY, X SERIES MONITOR/DEFIBRILLATOR 3/5 LEAD, NIBP, NIBP-MOD-G, SPO2, CPR EXPANSION PACK AND ETCO2, JAPAN · Class 3
All models of X SERIES (163)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04560233592995), received between Mar 21, 2018 and Dec 13, 2021 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unable to Obtain Readings” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Unable to Obtain Readings3
- Failure of Device to Self-Test1
- Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation1
- Incorrect Interpretation of Signal1
- Mechanical Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Information2
- No Patient Involvement2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 13, 2021Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN ECG SIGNAL VIA ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12989961 ↗MalfunctionDec 31, 2019Failure of Device to Self-Test; Failure of Device to Self-Test
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED SELF-TEST. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9534946 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2019Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation; Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT DURING A ROUTINE SHIFT CHECK BY A CLINICIAN, THE DEVICE FAILED TO DISCHARGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9355944 ↗MalfunctionJun 24, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE AND GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE DISPLAYED A "CABLE FAULT" MESSAGE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE CLINICIAN OBTAINED ANOTHER DEVICE TO CONTINUE TREATING THE PATIENT. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8726477 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2019Incorrect Interpretation of Signal; Incorrect Interpretation of Signal
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A (B)(6) MALE PATIENT FOR CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST, DURING TRANSPORT, THE DEVICE GAVE A "NO SHOCK ADVISED" PROMPT FOR A RHYTHM CLINICIANS BELIEVED WAS SHOCKABLE. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8603054 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2019Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE AND GENDER UNKNOWN) THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN ECG SIGNAL VIA ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8370978 ↗MalfunctionMar 21, 2018Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings
COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO TREAT A PATIENT (AGE & GENDER UNKNOWN), THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN ECG SIGNAL VIA ELECTRODE PADS. COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 7359871 ↗
Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices
- NA 861290Philips Medical Systems Hsg · Automated External Defibrillators (Non-Wearable)12 deaths5,167 reports
- NA 861288Philips Medical Systems Hsg · Automated External Defibrillators (Non-Wearable)21 deaths5,015 reports
- NA 861289Philips Medical Systems Hsg · Automated External Defibrillators (Non-Wearable)7 deaths3,385 reports
- R SERIES 30001005201310012Zoll Medical Corporation · Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable)10 deaths1,720 reports
- PHILIPS HeartStart FRxPhilips Electronics North America Corporation · Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable)26 deaths1,586 reports
- LIFEPAK CR2 99512Physio-Control, Inc. · Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable)8 deaths1,502 reports
- Lifeline Configuration DDU-100ADefibtech, L.L.C. · Automated External Defibrillators (Non-Wearable)1 death1,285 reports
- PHILIPS HeartStart FR3Philips Electronics North America Corporation · Automated External Defibrillators (Non-Wearable)10 deaths1,188 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page