Single Use Biliary Stent V PBD-200-1003Recalls & reported problems
Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170185618), received between Aug 14, 2024 and Aug 14, 2024 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
Patient problems
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Biliary Leak1
- Chest Pain1
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- Insufficient Information1
- Pancreatitis1
- Peritonitis1
- Septic Shock1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
DeathAug 14, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE LITERATURE TITLED "COVERED SELF-EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENTS VERSUS PLASTIC STENTS FOR ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HEPATICOGASTROSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION." BACKGROUND/AIMS: COVERED SELF-EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENTS (CSEMS) HAVE BECOME POPULAR FOR ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HEPATICOGASTROSTOMY WITH TRANSMURAL STENTING (EUS-HGS). WE COMPARED THE TIME TO RECURRENT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION (TRBO), COMPLICATIONS, AND REINTERVENTION RATES BETWEEN EUS-HGS USING PLASTIC STENT (PS) AND CSEMS IN PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE MALIGNANCIES AT MULTICENTER INSTITUTIONS IN JAPAN. METHODS: PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION WHO UNDERWENT EUS-HGS BETWEEN APRIL 2015 AND JULY 2020 AT ANY OF THE SIX PARTICIPATING FACILITIES WERE ENROLLED. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: TRBO; SECONDARY ENDPOINTS: RATE OF COMPLICATIONS OTHER THAN RECURRENT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION AND TECHNICAL SUCCESS RATE OF REINTERVENTION WERE EVALUATED. RESULTS: PS AND CSEMS WERE USED FOR EUS-HGS IN 109 AND 43 PATIENTS, RESPECTIVELY. THE TRBO WAS SIGNIFICANTLY LONGER IN THE CSEMS GROUP THAN IN THE PS GROUP (646 VS. 202 DAYS). MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS IDENTIFIED TWO INDEPENDENT FACTORS ASSOCIA
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19981463 ↗InjuryAug 14, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE LITERATURE TITLED "COVERED SELF-EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENTS VERSUS PLASTIC STENTS FOR ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HEPATICOGASTROSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION". BACKGROUND/AIMS: COVERED SELF-EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENTS (CSEMS) HAVE BECOME POPULAR FOR ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HEPATICOGASTROSTOMY WITH TRANSMURAL STENTING (EUS-HGS). WE COMPARED THE TIME TO RECURRENT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION (TRBO), COMPLICATIONS, AND REINTERVENTION RATES BETWEEN EUS-HGS USING PLASTIC STENT (PS) AND CSEMS IN PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE MALIGNANCIES AT MULTICENTER INSTITUTIONS IN JAPAN. METHODS: PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION WHO UNDERWENT EUS-HGS BETWEEN (B)(6) 2015 AND (B)(6) 2020 AT ANY OF THE SIX PARTICIPATING FACILITIES WERE ENROLLED. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: TRBO; SECONDARY ENDPOINTS: RATE OF COMPLICATIONS OTHER THAN RECURRENT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION AND TECHNICAL SUCCESS RATE OF REINTERVENTION WERE EVALUATED. RESULTS: PS AND CSEMS WERE USED FOR EUS-HGS IN 109 AND 43 PATIENTS, RESPECTIVELY. THE TRBO WAS SIGNIFICANTLY LONGER IN THE CSEMS GROUP THAN IN THE PS GROUP (646 VS. 202 DAYS). MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS IDENTIFIED TWO INDEPENDENT FACTORS ASSO
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Biliary Leak; Chest Pain; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pancreatitis; Peritonitis; Septic Shock; Ulcer; Unspecified Hepatic or Biliary Problem
MAUDE report 19981388 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page