Skip to content

EVIS EXERA II SMALL INTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS SIF TYPE Q180 (UDI 04953170242526)Recalls & reported problems

Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2

All models of EVIS EXERA II SMALL INTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE (4)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170242526), received between Mar 18, 2020 and Sep 10, 2024 — classified as 1 death, 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Clean Adequately” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Failure to Clean Adequately2
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Abdominal Pain1
  • Death1
  • Melena1
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
  • Unspecified Tissue Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 10, 2024Failure to Clean Adequately; Failure to Clean Adequately

    IT WAS OBSERVED DURING THE DEVICE INSPECTION, THAT THE SMALL INTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE EXHIBITED THE NOZZLE HAD FOREIGN OBJECTS. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20182727 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 21, 2024Failure to Clean Adequately; Failure to Clean Adequately

    THE USER FACILITY RETURNED A EVIS EXERA II SMALL INTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE TO THE SERVICE CENTER. DURING INSPECTION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE, THE NOZZLE HAD FOREIGN OBJECTS. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT REPORT ANY PATIENT USER INJURY OR HARM REPORTED TO OLYMPUS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20018901 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 14, 2024Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    IT WAS REPORTED THE EVIS EXERA II SMALL INTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE GAS CAP LEFT ON DURING ETO STERILIZATION RESULTING IN EXTENSIVE DAMAGE. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING REPROCESSING. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19538707 ↗
  • InjuryApr 14, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON MARCH 31, 2021, OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) RECEIVED THE LITERATURE TITLED "THE ROLE OF SINGLE-BALLOON COLONOSCOPY (SBC) FOR PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS INCOMPLETE STANDARD COLONOSCOPY: IS IT WORTH DOING IT?". THIS STUDY WAS CONDUCTED ON THE SINGLE-BALLOON OVERTUBE-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY FOR 100 PATIENTS FROM FEBRUARY 2008 TO OCTOBER 2014. IN THE LITERATURE, IT WAS REPORTED MUCOSAL DEFECT, SEVERE ABDOMINAL PAIN, AND HEMATOCHEZIA. THE MUCOSAL DEFECT AFTER THE POLYPECTOMY WAS SUCCESSFULLY CLOSED WITH HEMOCLIPS, AND THE PATIENT RECEIVED PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS AND REMAINED ASYMPTOMATIC. ANOTHER PATIENT SUFFERED FROM SEVERE ABDOMINAL PAIN AND HEMATOCHEZIA AFTER A DIAGNOSTIC SBC WITHOUT INTERVENTION. COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY RESULTS EXCLUDED PERFORATION. THIS OUTPATIENT WAS THEN ADMITTED FOR MEDICAL OBSERVATION AND WAS DISCHARGED HOME PAIN-FREE AFTER 4 DAYS. THEREFORE, OMSC ASSUMES THAT THE PATIENT SUFFERED FROM SEVERE ABDOMINAL PAIN AND HEMATOCHEZIA WAS AN ADVERSE EVENT TO SUBMIT DUE TO HOSPITALIZATION FOR MEDICAL OBSERVATION. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT DEVICE AND THE PATIENTS WERE NOT PROVIDED. THERE IS NO DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE'S MALFU

    Patient problems: Abdominal Pain; Melena; Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 11668524 ↗
  • DeathMar 18, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    OLYMPUS RECEIVED AN ARTICLE TITLED ¿INSERTION OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY TUBES WITH JEJUNAL EXTENSIONS USING THE ¿WEDGE¿ TECHNIQUE: A NOVEL METHOD TO PREVENT RETROGRADE TUBE MIGRATION INTO THE STOMACH¿. THERE WERE 17 PATIENTS ON THE STUDY. THE ARTICLE REPORTED THAT TWO ADVERSE EVENTS OCCURRED DUE TO PEG INSERTION ALTHOUGH NONE WERE RELATED TO THE JEJUNAL EXTENSION INSERTION ITSELF USING THE WEDGE TECHNIQUE. ONE FEMALE PATIENT DEVELOPED ASYMPTOMATIC PNEUMOPERITONEUM AFTER THE PROCEDURE. SHE WAS DISCHARGED 6 HOURS LATER WHEN A REPEAT ABDOMINAL X-RAY SHOWED RESOLUTION OF MOST OF THE FREE AIR. SHE REMAINED ASYMPTOMATIC UNTIL NOON THE FOLLOWING DAY WHEN SHE TOOK A NAP WITH HER HUSBAND, COUGHED ONCE, AND STOPPED BREATHING. RESUSCITATION WAS NOT PERFORMED, FOLLOWING THE PATIENT¿S PRIOR WISHES. AN AUTOPSY WAS OFFERED BUT DECLINED. THIS IS PATIENT 2 OF 2 ADVERSE EVENTS FOR THE SUBJECT STUDY.

    Patient problems: Death

    MAUDE report 9849898 ↗
  • InjuryMar 18, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    OLYMPUS RECEIVED AN ARTICLE TITLED ¿INSERTION OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY TUBES WITH JEJUNAL EXTENSIONS USING THE ¿WEDGE¿ TECHNIQUE: A NOVEL METHOD TO PREVENT RETROGRADE TUBE MIGRATION INTO THE STOMACH¿. THERE WERE 17 PATIENTS IN THE STUDY. THE ARTICLE REPORTED THAT TWO ADVERSE EVENTS OCCURRED DUE TO PEG INSERTION ALTHOUGH NONE WERE RELATED TO THE JEJUNAL EXTENSION INSERTION ITSELF USING THE WEDGE TECHNIQUE. ONE STUDY PATIENT HAD THE PEG TUBE PLACED BUT DEVELOPED AN AIR LEAK AROUND THE PEG AFTER INSERTION. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY TAKEN BACK TO THE OPERATING ROOM WHERE AN ABERRANT LOOP OF MESENTERY WAS FOUND BETWEEN THE ABDOMINAL AND ANTERIOR GASTRIC WALL PREVENTING APPOSITION TO FORM THE GASTROSTOMY TRACT. THE PEGJ DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND RE-INSERTED AFTER THE MESENTERY HAD BEEN RELOCATED, AND THE PATIENT RECOVERED FULLY. THIS REPORT IS FOR PATIENT 1 OF 2 FOR SUBJECT STUDY.

    Patient problems: Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 9849786 ↗

Other Endoscope, accessories, narrow band spectrum devices

All Endoscope, accessories, narrow band spectrum devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page