Single Use Nasal Biliary Drainage Tube V PBD-V803W-06Recalls & reported problems
Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170309335), received between Oct 2, 2023 and Oct 2, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
Patient problems
- Pancreatitis2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 2, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE TITLED " EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND ENDOSCOPIC PANCREATIC STENTING WITHOUT PANCREATIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PANCREATOLITHIASIS: A CASE SERIES." LITERATURE SUMMARY THIS STUDY DISCUSSED ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY (ESWL) AS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FIRST CHOICE IN TREATING PANCREATOLITHIASIS. THE INPATIENT TREATMENT PLAN WAS PERFORMED EVERY 3 MONTHS WITH A SET NUMBER OF SESSIONS OF ESWL WITH ENDOSCOPIC PANCREATIC STENTING (EPS) IMPLANTED OR REPLACED. A TOTAL OF 8 PATIENTS WERE INVOLVED IN THIS CASE SERIES WITH A MEDIAN AGE OF 69 YEARS. THE MEDIAN TIME FROM INITIAL TREATMENT TO TARGET STONE DISAPPEARANCE WAS 208.5 DAYS (RANGE, 4¿452). SYMPTOMS IMPROVED AFTER THE INITIAL INPATIENT TREATMENT IN ALL PATIENTS. THE MEDIAN FOLLOW-UP TIME AFTER STONE DISAPPEARANCE WAS 950 DAYS, WITH TWO CASES OF STONE RECURRENCE. MILD PANCREATITIS OCCURRED TWICE IN ERCP AND ONCE IN ESWL. THREE CASES OF STENT DISLOCATION WERE OBSERVED; DISLOCATION THAT DID NOT MEET THE SEVERITY GRADE OCCURRED TWICE OF THE THREE CASES. HENCE, COMBINING ESWL WITH EPS WITHOUT EPST CAN TREAT PANCREATOLITHIASIS SAFELY. TYPE OF AD
Patient problems: Pancreatitis
MAUDE report 17851301 ↗InjuryOct 2, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE TITLED " EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND ENDOSCOPIC PANCREATIC STENTING WITHOUT PANCREATIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PANCREATOLITHIASIS: A CASE SERIES." LITERATURE SUMMARY: THIS STUDY DISCUSSED ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY (ESWL) AS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FIRST CHOICE IN TREATING PANCREATOLITHIASIS. THE INPATIENT TREATMENT PLAN WAS PERFORMED EVERY 3 MONTHS WITH A SET NUMBER OF SESSIONS OF ESWL WITH ENDOSCOPIC PANCREATIC STENTING (EPS) IMPLANTED OR REPLACED. A TOTAL OF 8 PATIENTS WERE INVOLVED IN THIS CASE SERIES WITH A MEDIAN AGE OF 69 YEARS. THE MEDIAN TIME FROM INITIAL TREATMENT TO TARGET STONE DISAPPEARANCE WAS 208.5 DAYS (RANGE, 4¿452). SYMPTOMS IMPROVED AFTER THE INITIAL INPATIENT TREATMENT IN ALL PATIENTS. THE MEDIAN FOLLOW-UP TIME AFTER STONE DISAPPEARANCE WAS 950 DAYS, WITH TWO CASES OF STONE RECURRENCE. MILD PANCREATITIS OCCURRED TWICE IN ERCP AND ONCE IN ESWL. THREE CASES OF STENT DISLOCATION WERE OBSERVED; DISLOCATION THAT DID NOT MEET THE SEVERITY GRADE OCCURRED TWICE OF THE THREE CASES. HENCE, COMBINING ESWL WITH EPS WITHOUT EPST CAN TREAT PANCREATOLITHIASIS SAFELY. TYPE OF A
Patient problems: Pancreatitis
MAUDE report 17851255 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page