Single Use Biliary Drainage Stent V PBD-1030-1005Recalls & reported problems
Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170346125), received between Feb 14, 2023 and Feb 14, 2023 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
Patient problems
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- Insufficient Information1
- Unspecified Hepatic or Biliary Problem1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
DeathFeb 14, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE TITLED "POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF RESECTABLE PERIAMPULLARY CANCER ACCOMPANIED BY OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE WITH AND WITHOUT PREOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPIC BILIARY DRAINAGE." THIS RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY AIMED TO EVALUATE POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN TERMS OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS, LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAYS, AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH PERIAMPULLARY CANCERS WHO UNDERWENT CURATIVE SURGICAL RESECTION WITH OR WITHOUT PREOPERATIVE BILIARY DRAINAGE (PBD) IN 104 PATIENTS. THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS WAS 58.6% IN THE PBD GROUP WHILE 73.9% IN THE DIRECT SURGERY (DS) GROUP (RELATIVE RISK [RR] 1.26, 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL [CI] 0.92, 1.73, P=0.155) AND THE DIFFERENCE WAS NOT SIGNIFICANT EXCEPT IN BILE LEAKAGE (RR 8.83, 95% CI 1.26, 61.79, P = 0.021) AND INTRAOPERATIVE BLEEDING (RR 3.97, 95% CI 0.88, 17.85, P = 0.049) WHICH WERE HIGHER IN THE DS GROUP. THE ONE-YEAR SURVIVAL RATE WAS SLIGHTLY LESS IN THE DS GROUP. THE STUDY RESULTS CONFIRMED THAT PBD MAY BE NOT NECESSARY FOR ALL RESECTABLE PERIAMPULLARY CANCER PATIENTS, BUT THERE MIGHT BE A ROLE IN THOSE WITH SEVERELY JAUNDICE (>14.6 MG/ DL), AS IT HELPS LOWER RISK OF INTRAOPE
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16371438 ↗InjuryFeb 14, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE TITLED "POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF RESECTABLE PERIAMPULLARY CANCER ACCOMPANIED BY OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE WITH AND WITHOUT PREOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPIC BILIARY DRAINAGE." THIS RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY AIMED TO EVALUATE POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN TERMS OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS, LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAYS, AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH PERIAMPULLARY CANCERS WHO UNDERWENT CURATIVE SURGICAL RESECTION WITH OR WITHOUT PREOPERATIVE BILIARY DRAINAGE (PBD) IN 104 PATIENTS. THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS WAS 58.6% IN THE PBD GROUP WHILE 73.9% IN THE DIRECT SURGERY (DS) GROUP (RELATIVE RISK [RR] 1.26, 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL [CI] 0.92, 1.73, P=0.155) AND THE DIFFERENCE WAS NOT SIGNIFICANT EXCEPT IN BILE LEAKAGE (RR 8.83, 95% CI 1.26, 61.79, P = 0.021) AND INTRAOPERATIVE BLEEDING (RR 3.97, 95% CI 0.88, 17.85, P = 0.049) WHICH WERE HIGHER IN THE DS GROUP. THE ONE-YEAR SURVIVAL RATE WAS SLIGHTLY LESS IN THE DS GROUP. THE STUDY RESULTS CONFIRMED THAT PBD MAY BE NOT NECESSARY FOR ALL RESECTABLE PERIAMPULLARY CANCER PATIENTS, BUT THERE MIGHT BE A ROLE IN THOSE WITH SEVERELY JAUNDICE (>14.6 MG/ DL), AS IT HELPS LOWER RISK OF INTRAOPE
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Unspecified Hepatic or Biliary Problem; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 16371430 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page