Skip to content

EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS TGF-UC180J (UDI 04953170355493)Recalls & reported problems

Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2

All models of EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE (9)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170355493), received between Jun 2, 2022 and Jan 8, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Contamination1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Failure to Clean Adequately1
  • Peeled/Delaminated1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2
  • Septic Shock2
  • Unspecified Hepatic or Biliary Problem1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS OBSERVED DURING THE DEVICE INSPECTION THAT THE GASTROVIDEOSCOPE WAS DETACHED FROM THE DISTAL END SIDE DUE TO MISSING SEALANT, AND THERE WAS MISSING SEALANT AT THE EDGE OF THE PINK RUBBER. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24004253 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 21, 2023Failure to Clean Adequately; Failure to Clean Adequately

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE HAD AN AIR/WATER LEAK AND WAS FAILING REPROCESSING. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE FOLLOWING REPORTABLE MALFUNCTION WAS FOUND: FOREIGN MATTER CAME OUT OF THE NOZZLE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM. THIS MEDICAL DEVICE REPORT (MDR) IS BEING SUBMITTED TO CAPTURE THE REPORTABLE MALFUNCTION FOUND DURING EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17584475 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 25, 2022Contamination; Contamination

    THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED BY THE CUSTOMER FOR EVALUATION AND REPAIR FOR THE ISSUE OF CHANNEL PORT NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY AS OBSERVED DURING REPROCESSING. THERE IS NO HARM REPORTED TO ANY PATIENT. UPON EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS PRESENCE OF FOREIGN OBJECT IN THE FORCEPS PASSAGE. THIS MEDWATCH IS BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE REPORTABLE ISSUE OF THE FOREIGN MATERIAL FOUND IN THE FORCEPS PASSAGE AS OBSERVED DURING DEVICE EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15095321 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2022Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    THIS IS A LOANER DEVICE RETURNED BY A CUSTOMER. UPON INSPECTION, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE ULTRASOUND PROBE LENS WAS PEELED WITH A MISSING PIECE. THERE IS NO REPORTED HARM TO ANY PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15079493 ↗
  • InjuryJun 2, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT IS REPORTED IN THE LITERATURE ARTICLE TITLED:¿ ENDOSCOPIC INTERNAL DRAINAGE OF COMPLEX BILOMAS AND BILIARY LEAKS BY TRANSMURAL OR TRANSPAPILLARY/TRANSFISTULARY ACCESS,¿ PATIENT EXPERIENCED ADVERSE EVENTS DURING AND AFTER PROCEDURES USING OLYMPUS DEVICES. CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS GF-UCT140-AL5 (FOR DEATH OF PATIENTS). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS GF-UCT140-AL5(FOR ADVERSE EVENTS OTHER THAN DEATH). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TGF-UC180J (FOR DEATH OF PATIENTS). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TGF-UC180J (FOR ADVERSE EVENTS OTHER THAN DEATH). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TJF-160VR (FOR DEATH OF PATIENTS). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TJF-160VR (FOR ADVERSE EVENTS OTHER THAN DEATH). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER C22182246 REPORTS TJF-Q180V (FOR DEATH OF PATIENTS). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER C22182247 REPORTS TJF-Q180V (FOR ADVERSE EVENTS OTHER THAN DEATH). STUDY BACKGROUND AND AIM: BILOMAS MOST FREQUENTLY RESULT FROM POSTOPERATIVE BILE LEAKS. THE ENDOSCOPIC CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT IS SPHINCTEROTOMY STENT PLACEMENT. IN COMPLEX CASES, SUCH AS ALTERED ANATOMY OR FAILURE OF CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Septic Shock; Unspecified Hepatic or Biliary Problem

    MAUDE report 14578240 ↗
  • DeathJun 2, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT IS REPORTED IN THE LITERATURE ARTICLE TITLED:¿ ENDOSCOPIC INTERNAL DRAINAGE OF COMPLEX BILOMAS AND BILIARY LEAKS BY TRANSMURAL OR TRANSPAPILLARY/TRANSFISTULARY ACCESS,¿ PATIENT EXPERIENCED ADVERSE EVENTS DURING AND AFTER PROCEDURES USING OLYMPUS DEVICES. CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS GF-UCT140-AL5 (FOR DEATH OF PATIENTS). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS GF-UCT140-AL5(FOR ADVERSE EVENTS OTHER THAN DEATH). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TGF-UC180J (FOR DEATH OF PATIENTS). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TGF-UC180J (FOR ADVERSE EVENTS OTHER THAN DEATH). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TJF-160VR (FOR DEATH OF PATIENTS). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TJF-160VR (FOR ADVERSE EVENTS OTHER THAN DEATH). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TJF-Q180V (FOR DEATH OF PATIENTS). CASE WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) REPORTS TJF-Q180V (FOR ADVERSE EVENTS OTHER THAN DEATH). STUDY BACKGROUND AND AIM: BILOMAS MOST FREQUENTLY RESULT FROM POSTOPERATIVE BILE LEAKS. THE ENDOSCOPIC CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT IS SPHINCTEROTOMY STENT PLACEMENT. IN COMPLEX CASES, SUCH AS ALTERED ANATOMY OR FAILURE OF CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT, TRAN

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Septic Shock

    MAUDE report 14578194 ↗

Other Endoscope, accessories, narrow band spectrum devices

All Endoscope, accessories, narrow band spectrum devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page