Skip to content

THUNDERBEAT 5 mm,45 cm,Front-actuated Grip Type S TB-0545FCS (UDI 04953170383526)Recalls & reported problems

Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · THUNDERBEAT 5 mm,45 cm,Front-actuated Grip Type S · Class U

All models of THUNDERBEAT 5 mm,45 cm,Front-actuated Grip Type S (3)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

2 open recalls name this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
15
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
2

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170383526), received between Aug 27, 2018 and Mar 11, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 13 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (14 reports).

2 FDA recall records name this device's identifier, 2 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Oct 22, 2025Class IIOpen, Classified

    Firm is initiating a removal due to continued reports of adverse events.

    Z-1371-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

  2. Nov 25, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified

    The probe tips of the hand instruments are being damaged or breaking including pad damage and detachment.

    Z-0999-2025 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break14
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Melted1
  • Thickening of Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions13
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 11, 2024Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Thickening of Material; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Thickening of Material

    IT WAS REPORTED, THE THUNDERBEAT COAGULATES WITHOUT CUTTING, AND AFTER IT WARMS UP, IT BREAKS AFTER 20 MINUTES. THE ISSUE CAUSED AN ADDITIONAL 25-MINUTE PROCEDURAL TIME. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING AN UNKNOWN THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18882740 ↗
  • InjuryJun 9, 2023Break; Break

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO OLYMPUS THAT DURING THERAPEUTIC LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY, ONE OF THE TWO PROBES OF THIS ULTRASONIC SURGICAL DEVICE, BROKE AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT'S ABDOMEN. THE GENERATOR WENT INTO ALARM BECAUSE THE FORCEPS COULD NO LONGER FUNCTION. THE PIECE WAS IMMEDIATELY RECOVERED AND THE CLAMP ISOLATED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE OPERATING MODE WAS COAGULATION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. NO PROCEDURE DELAY. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF FURTHER PATIENT OR USER HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17100908 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2022Break; Break

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO OLYMPUS, THE UPPER JAW OF THE SUBJECT DEVICE BROKE OFF AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT DURING A THERAPEUTIC GASTRIC SLEEVE/BYPASS PROCEDURE. THE TIP WAS RETRIEVED. THE TIP SEPARATED WHILE APPLYING SEAL & CUT SETTING. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15680781 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 12, 2022Break; Break

    AS REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT BY THE CUSTOMER, DURING A THERAPEUTIC HEPATECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE PROBE TIP OF THE DEVICE BROKE OFF AFTER ONE ACTIVATION. THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT¿S BODY BY GRASPING. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A ANOTHER SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE IS NO HARM OR ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE USER SUSPECTED THE DURABILITY OF THE DEVICE AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED BEFORE USE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13238402 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 10, 2021Break; Break

    OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) WAS INFORMED FROM USER FACILITY THAT THE PROBE TIP WAS BROKEN DURING A THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE. THE BROKEN TIP COULD BE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12298925 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 9, 2021Break; Break

    OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) WAS INFORMED FROM USER FACILITY THAT THE PROBE TIP WAS BROKEN WITHOUT ANY REASON DURING THE THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE,. THE USER FACILITY TOOK OUT A BROKEN TIP BY GRASPING IT FROM THE PATIENT BODY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12141258 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 6, 2021Break; Break

    OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) WAS INFORMED BY THE HEALTH PROFESSIONAL THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE USING THE SUBJECT DEVICE, THE PROBE WAS BROKEN OFF. THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED IMMEDIATELY FROM INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12119910 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 23, 2021Break; Break

    OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) WAS INFORMED BY THE PHYSICIAN THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE USING THE SUBJECT DEVICE, THE PROBE WAS BROKEN OFF INTO THE PATIENT AND AN UNSPECIFIED ERROR OCCURRED. THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12055265 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 24, 2021Melted; Melted

    THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR INTERMITTENT BI-POLAR FUNCTIONALITY ISSUE DURING THE PROCEDURE. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT A PORTION OF THE TEFLON PAD CHARRED, THINNED OUT, AND WORN OUT AT THE EDGES, THUS CREATING A VOID AND EXPOSING A SMALL PORTION OF METAL. THERE IS NO REPORTED HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME DEVICE BY GRASPING THE TISSUE AND ACTIVATING THE DEVICE TO REGISTER A MISFIRE; THEN RE-GRASPING THE TISSUE TO REACTIVATE THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11872526 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 5, 2021Break; Break

    OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) WAS INFORMED BY THE HEALTH PROFESSIONAL THAT DURING A TOTAL GASTRECTOMY USING THE SUBJECT DEVICE, THE PROBE WAS BROKEN OFF. THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED FROM INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11781035 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 3, 2021Break; Break

    OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING REPORT FROM THE USER. DURING THE TOTAL GASTRECTOMY, THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS USED. WHEN THE DEVICE WAS ACTIVATED ABOUT TWO OR THREE TIMES, THE PROBE TIP WAS BROKEN OUT INSIDE OF THE PATIENT BODY. AS THE BROKEN TIP COULD BE FOUND OUT VISUALLY, THE USER COULD TAKE IT OUT IMMEDIATELY FROM THE PATIENT BODY. THE PROCEDURE WAS TERMINATED WITH A REPLACEMENT OF THE SAME SET OF EQUIPMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11766959 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 29, 2021Break; Break

    OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) WAS INFORMED BY THE HEALTH PROFESSIONAL THAT DURING A TOTAL GASTRECTOMY USING THE SUBJECT DEVICE, THE PROBE WAS BROKEN OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE BROKEN TIP COULD BE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT BODY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11750915 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 5, 2021Break; Break

    OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) WAS INFORMED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS USED. THE UPPER JAW WAS BENT, ALTHOUGH INITIALLY THE DEVICE HAD PERFORMED CORRECTLY. THERE WAS AN AUDIBLE ALARM. WHEN THE USER CHECKED THE SUBJECT DEVICE OUTSIDE THE PATIENT, THE JAW WAS SEPARATED AND FELL OFF. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11613289 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 21, 2019Break; Break

    DURING A TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY, THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS USED. THE PROBE OF THE SUBJECT DEVICE BROKE OFF AND FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT BODY. THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THIS IS THE REPORT REGARDING THE BREAKAGE OF THE PROBE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8626992 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 27, 2018Break; Break

    DURING A SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY, THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS USED. IN THE PROCEDURE, THE TISSUE PAD OF THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS PEELED OFF. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THIS IS THE REPORT REGARDING THE PEELED OFF OF THE TISSUE PAD.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7817256 ↗

Other Instrument, ultrasonic surgical devices

All Instrument, ultrasonic surgical devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page