Skip to content

Sublime™ Radial Access 018 RX PTA Dilatation Catheter SRA-DC18-20080Recalls & reported problems

Creagh Medical Limited · 018 Radial RX PTA, 5Fr, 2.0 mm x 80 mm, 220 cm · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 05391525785943), received between May 14, 2025 and May 14, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Loss of or Failure to Bond1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 14, 2025Loss of or Failure to Bond; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance

    THE SITE REPORTED THE BALLOON CATHETER BROKE IN THE PATIENT'S BODY PRIOR TO INFLATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED. THE BALLOON CATHETER SHAFT BROKE PROXIMAL TO THE RAPID EXCHANGE (RX) PORT. THE ISSUE OCCURRED AFTER THE FIRST INFLATION. AFTER DEFLATION, THE CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FURTHER DISTALLY, THROUGH THE LESION AND CALCIFICATION. IT WAS NOTED RESISTANCE WAS FELT. IT WAS AT THIS TIME, THE SHAFT BROKE. THE COMPLETE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED. THE ISSUE HAPPENED AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE. THE SUBLIME BALLOON WAS USED AFTER OTHER BALLOONS COULD NO CROSS THE LESION. THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO RECROSS THE LESION WITH A GUIDEWIRE UPON BALLOON REMOVAL. THIS WAS WHERE THE PROCEDURE CONCLUDED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM OR PROCEDURE DELAY DUE TO THE SHAFT BREAK.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22023505 ↗

Other Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices

All Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page