Skip to content

Advance Serenity™ 18 SER18-135-60-150Recalls & reported problems

Creagh Medical Limited · 018 Advance Serenity 6x150, 135cm · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05391525787176), received between Nov 6, 2023 and Dec 3, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture1
  • Loss of or Failure to Bond1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 3, 2024Loss of or Failure to Bond; Loss of or Failure to Bond

    THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS USED A LOWER LEG ANGIOGRAM OF THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). FOLLOWING CROSSING THE LESION AND BALLOONING, THE BALLOON DETACHED FROM THE CATHETER AND HAD TO BE RETRIEVED VIA A SNARE. THE BALLOON WAS FULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITHOUT HARM. THE BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDICATED THE BALLOON WAS PREPPED PER IFU AND THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF DEVICE DAMAGE. THE SITE CONFIRMED NEGATIVE PRESSURE WAS HELD DURING LOADING AND MOVEMENT TO THE TARGET LESION. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE LOSS DURING LOADING. THE TARGET VESSEL HAD MODERATE CALCIFICATION WITH A LESION LENGTH OF APPROXIMATELY 60-80 MM. THE DEGREE OF STENOSIS WAS NOTED TO BE MODERATE. THE REPORTED ISSUE OCCURRED AFTER THE INITIAL INFLATION. THE PROCEDURE WAS CONSIDERED SUCCESSFUL. THE LENGTH OF PROCEDURE DELAY WAS REPORTED TO BE 10-15 MINUTES. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE WITHOUT ISSUE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 20839621 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    DURING A LOWER LEG ANGIOPLASTY, THE BALLOON BURST BEFORE THE RATED BURST PRESSURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH THE USE OF A COMPETITOR 'S DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS DISPOSED OF BY THE CUSTOMER. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18076321 ↗

Other Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices

All Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page