Skip to content

EnSite™ ENSITE-ACBL-160-01Recalls & reported problems

St. Jude Medical, Inc. · Connect Cable · Class 2

All models of EnSite (37)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 05415067033376), received between Mar 31, 2026 and Mar 31, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Communication or Transmission Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Communication or Transmission Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 31, 2026Communication or Transmission Problem

    DURING A SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A PROCEDURAL DELAY. THE POTENTIALS OF ELECTRODES 1-2 DID NOT APPEAR AFTER INSERTION INTO THE PATIENT AND THEY WOULD NOT DISPLAY AS EXPECTED EITHER. ELECTRODES 3-4 WERE NORMAL. THE CABLE AND CATHETER WERE REPLACED WITH NO RESOLUTION. THE PROCEDURE WAS SWITCHED TO NON-ABBOTT MANUFACTURER (JOHNSON & JOHNSON) TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. LATER ON, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE ENSITE X AMPERE CONNECT CABLE WAS THE CAUSE OF THE ISSUE RESOLVED AFTER REPLACEMENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24745349 ↗

Other Computer, diagnostic, programmable devices

All Computer, diagnostic, programmable devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page