VivaSight™ 2 DLT Kit 41 Fr - LEFT 412411000Recalls & reported problems
Ambu A/S · VivaSight 2 DLT Kit 41 Fr - LEFT · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05707480145799), received between Feb 19, 2026 and Feb 19, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inflation Problem” (2 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Jun 3, 2022Class IIOpen, Classified
Firm has received complaints on the device concerning leak/rupture of either the bronchial or tracheal cuff. Leakage during procedure could lead to loss of secure airway and will require re-intubation of patient.
Z-1420-2022 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Inflation Problem2
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 19, 2026Inflation Problem
DOCTOR ATTEMPTED STANDARD THORACIC PROCEDURE - INTUBATION OF A PATIENT USING VIVASIGHT 2 DLT. FIRST, THEY USED A 41FR AND THEN DOWNSIZED TO A 39FR. BOTH DLTS HAD THE CUFF BURST. CONSULTANT INFLATED THE CUFF WITH 2-3ML OF AIR AND THE CUFF WOULD NATURALLY DEFLATE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE HOSPITAL WAS PROVIDED BY THE DOCTOR: 'INTERMITTENTLY WE RUN INTO AN ISSUE IN WHICH DESPITE THE OPERATIVE LUNG BEING ISOLATED IT IS NOT DEFLATING WHEN OPENED TO AIR. CONDITION PERSISTS EVEN WITH APPLICATION OF DIRECT SUCTION. AIRWAY MANAGED DESPITE COMPROMISES TO THE SURGERY. MAY HAVE RESULTED IN THE NEED FOR LARGER INCISIONS AND EVEN UNNECESSARY THORACOTOMIES. TUBE CHANGED TO SHILEY BRONCOCATH OR BRONCHOSCOPE USED TO DOUBLE CHECK PLACEMENT DESPITE TUBE SEEMINGLY BEING WELL PLACED ACCORDING TO THE INBUILT CAMERA.'' IT IS NOT INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ASSOCIATED HARM OF HYPOXIA, SINCE PATIENT'S AIRWAY WAS MANAGED. HOWEVER, DUE TO LACK OF INFORMATION ON THE COMPROMISES TO THE SURGERY, THE INCIDENT IS BEING REPORTED. NOTE THAT TWO REPORTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO THE INVOLVEMENT OF TWO DEVICES. THE MANUFACTURER REFERENCE NUMBER OF THE SECOND REPORT IS 1220828-2026-00005.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24392621 ↗MalfunctionFeb 19, 2026Inflation Problem
DOCTOR ATTEMPTED STANDARD THORACIC PROCEDURE - INTUBATION OF A PATIENT USING VIVASIGHT 2 DLT. FIRST, THEY USED A 41FR AND THEN DOWNSIZED TO A 39FR. BOTH DLTS HAD THE CUFF BURST. CONSULTANT INFLATED THE CUFF WITH 2-3ML OF AIR AND THE CUFF WOULD NATURALLY DEFLATE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE HOSPITAL WAS PROVIDED BY THE DOCTOR: 'INTERMITTENTLY WE RUN INTO AN ISSUE IN WHICH DESPITE THE OPERATIVE LUNG BEING ISOLATED IT IS NOT DEFLATING WHEN OPENED TO AIR. CONDITION PERSISTS EVEN WITH APPLICATION OF DIRECT SUCTION. AIRWAY MANAGED DESPITE COMPROMISES TO THE SURGERY. MAY HAVE RESULTED IN THE NEED FOR LARGER INCISIONS AND EVEN UNNECESSARY THORACOTOMIES. TUBE CHANGED TO SHILEY BRONCOCATH OR BRONCHOSCOPE USED TO DOUBLE CHECK PLACEMENT DESPITE TUBE SEEMINGLY BEING WELL PLACED ACCORDING TO THE INBUILT CAMERA.'' IT IS NOT INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ASSOCIATED HARM OF HYPOXIA, SINCE PATIENT'S AIRWAY WAS MANAGED. HOWEVER, DUE TO LACK OF INFORMATION ON THE COMPROMISES TO THE SURGERY, THE INCIDENT IS BEING REPORTED. NOTE THAT TWO REPORTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO THE INVOLVEMENT OF TWO DEVICES. THE MANUFACTURER REFERENCE NUMBER OF THE SECOND REPORT IS 9610691-2026-00005.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24387190 ↗
Other TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR) devices
- HUDSON RCI IPN048996Teleflex Incorporated · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)64 reports
- VivaSight™ 2 DLT Kit 37 Fr - LEFT 412371000Ambu A/S · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)1 recall10 reports
- HUDSON RCI IPN048995Teleflex Incorporated · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)58 reports
- VivaSight™ 2 DLT Kit 39 Fr - LEFT 412391000Ambu A/S · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)1 recall6 reports
- VivaSight™ 2 DLT Kit 35 Fr - LEFT 412351000Ambu A/S · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)1 recall2 reports
- Portex 198-35LIcu Medical, Inc. · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)48 reports
- Portex 198-37LIcu Medical, Inc. · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)44 reports
- HUDSON RCI IPN049000Teleflex Incorporated · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)40 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page