Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter 586008022Recalls & reported problems
OrbusNeich Medical (ShenZhen) Co., Ltd. · Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Catheter · Class 2
All models of Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 06934955901331), received between Jul 8, 2026 and Jul 8, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation2
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 8, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT LESION IN AN UNSPECIFIED RIGHT LOWER EXTREMITY ARTERY. DURING THE PROCEDURE VIA COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS THE TIP OF THE 6.0MM X 80MM JADE 14 PTA OTW BALLOON FRACTURED. SURGICAL CUT-DOWN WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON TIP. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 7/7/2026: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT HEAVILY CALCIFIED, MILD TORTUOUS, 90% STENOSED LESION IN RIGHT DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) VIA COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE TIP OF THE 6.0MM X 80MM JADE 14 PTA OTW BALLOON FRACTURED UPON REMOVAL OF THE BALLOON FROM THE SHEATH AND CAME OFF INSIDE THE DISTAL SFA STENT. SURGICAL CUT-DOWN WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON TIP BUT WAS NOT COMPLETELY SUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE AFTER THE PROCEDURE AND DISCHARGED AS PLANNED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. Q1. ANATOMICAL INFORMATION? (VESSEL / LOCATION / TORTUOSITY / CALCIFICATION / STENOSIS % / ETC.) PLEASE PROVIDE REASON IF UNAVAILABLE (HOSPITAL POLICY, ETC.) A1. RIGHT SFA, DISTAL RIGHT SFA HEAVILY CALCIFIED, MILD TORTUOSITY AND 90% STENOSIS. Q2. IS THERE ANY INDICATION AS T
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25757583 ↗InjuryJul 8, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT LESION IN AN UNSPECIFIED RIGHT LOWER EXTREMITY ARTERY. DURING THE PROCEDURE VIA COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS THE TIP OF THE 6.0MM X 80MM JADE 14 PTA OTW BALLOON FRACTURED. SURGICAL CUT-DOWN WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON TIP. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2026: "IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT HEAVILY CALCIFIED, MILD TORTUOUS, 90% STENOSED LESION IN RIGHT DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) VIA COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE TIP OF THE 6.0MM X 80MM JADE 14 PTA OTW BALLOON FRACTURED UPON REMOVAL OF THE BALLOON FROM THE SHEATH AND CAME OFF INSIDE THE DISTAL SFA STENT. SURGICAL CUT-DOWN WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON TIP BUT WAS NOT COMPLETELY SUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE AFTER THE PROCEDURE AND DISCHARGED AS PLANNED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. Q1. ANATOMICAL INFORMATION? (VESSEL / LOCATION / TORTUOSITY / CALCIFICATION / STENOSIS % / ETC.) PLEASE PROVIDE REASON IF UNAVAILABLE (HOSPITAL POLICY, ETC.) A1. RIGHT SFA, DISTAL RIGHT SFA HEAVILY CALCIFIED, MILD TORTUOSITY AND 90% STENOSIS Q2. IS THERE ANY INDICATION A
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25757580 ↗
Other Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page