Skip to content

Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter 586024022Recalls & reported problems

OrbusNeich Medical (ShenZhen) Co., Ltd. · Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Catheter · Class 2

All models of Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 06934955901386), received between Aug 27, 2024 and Sep 6, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture2
  • Material Separation2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 6, 2024Material Rupture; Material Separation; Material Rupture; Material Separation

    DURING PROCEDURE USING A JADE BALLOON INSIDE A STENT IN SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA), THE BALLOON RUPTURED DURING RETRIEVAL WHEN THE BALLOON GOT STUCK ON THE STRUT OF THE STENT AND GOT DEFLATED. IT RIPPED THE BALLOON IN HALF. THE DISTAL TIP OF THE BALLOON WAS RETRIEVED USING A SNARE. NO FRAGMENTS WERE LEFT IN-VIVO. THE BALLOON WAS NOT INFLATED AT ALL. THERE WAS CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE, AND A REPLACEMENT BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT ANY ISSUES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20156193 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    DURING PROCEDURE USING A JADE BALLOON INSIDE A STENT IN SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA), THE BALLOON POPPED DURING RETRIEVAL WHEN THE BALLOON GOT STUCK ON THE STRUT OF THE STENT AND GOT DEFLATED. IT RIPPED THE BALLOON IN HALF. THE DISTAL TIP OF THE BALLOON WAS RETRIEVED USING A SNARE. NO FRAGMENTS WERE LEFT IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: THE BALLOON WAS NOT ABLE TO BE INFLATED. PATIENT IS FINE. A REPLACEMENT BALLOON WAS USED WITH NO PROBLEM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20122974 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    A JADE BALLOON RUPTURED IN-VIVO AFTER TREATMENT OF A 80% STENOSED, SEVERELY CALCIFIED, 6MM MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. A PIECE OF THE BALLOON WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. A SNARE WAS USED TO RETRIEVE THE FRACTURED COMPONENT. THE PATIENT WAS IN STABLE CONDITION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20077023 ↗

Other Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices

All Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page