Skip to content

Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter 596008022Recalls & reported problems

OrbusNeich Medical (ShenZhen) Co., Ltd. · Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Catheter · Class 2

All models of Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 06934955903908), received between Sep 18, 2024 and Sep 25, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Entrapment of Device” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Entrapment of Device2
  • Material Rupture2

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 25, 2024Entrapment of Device; Material Rupture; Entrapment of Device; Material Rupture

    A 6MM, 80% STENOSED, HEAVILY CALCIFIED POPLITEAL ARTERY (PA) WAS THE TARGET TREATMENT AREA. THE JADE BALLOON WAS ADVANCED WITH THE AID OF A COMMAND ES GUIDE WIRE. THE JADE BALLOON WAS INFLATED MULTIPLE TIMES TO 28 ATMOSPHERE PRESSURE (ATM), PAST THE BURST PRESSURE, RESULTING IN A BALLOON RUPTURE. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE JADE BALLOON, IT COULD NOT BE REMOVED. A SNARE WAS USED BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSPORTED TO THE HOSPITAL FOR SURGERY AND HAD THE JADE BALLOON REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 9/06/2024, THE PATIENT IS STILL HOSPITALIZED. THE PHYSICIAN STATED, THE JADE BALLOON WASN'T INTENTIONALLY INFLATED TO BURST BUT WAS INFLATED PAST BURST PRESSURE DUE TO A VERY RESISTANT LESION. WHEN THE JADE BALLOON RUPTURED, NO DETACHMENT WAS OBSERVED. THE COLLAPSED JADE BALLOON COULD NOT BE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED WITHOUT SURGERY INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 20301639 ↗
  • InjurySep 18, 2024Entrapment of Device; Material Rupture; Entrapment of Device; Material Rupture

    A 6MM, 80% STENOSED, HEAVILY CALCIFIED POPLITEAL ARTERY (PA) WAS THE TARGET TREATMENT AREA. THE JADE BALLOON WAS ADVANCED WITH THE AID OF A COMMAND ES GUIDE WIRE. THE JADE BALLOON WAS INFLATED MULTIPLE TIMES TO 28 ATMOSPHERE PRESSURE (ATM), WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE JADE BALLOON, IT COULD NOT BE REMOVED. A SNARE WAS USED BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSPORTED TO THE HOSPITAL FOR SURGERY AND HAD THE JADE BALLOON REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT IS STILL HOSPITALIZED. THE PHYSICIAN STATED, THE JADE BALLOON WASN'T INTENTIONALLY INFLATED TO BURST BUT WAS INFLATED PAST BURST PRESSURE DUE TO A VERY RESISTANT LESION. WHEN THE JADE BALLOON RUPTURED, NO DETACHMENT WAS OBSERVED. THE COLLAPSED JADE BALLOON COULD NOT BE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED WITHOUT SURGERY INTERVENTION. BACKGROUND: PATIENT INFORMATION: 44 YEARS, MALE, 110 KG. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 2024/9/14 AS BELOW: 1. THE VESSEL WAS 6MM, 80% STENOSED, HEAVILY CALCIFIED POPLITEAL ARTERY (PA) 2. TO CLARIFY, WAS THE BALLOON INTENTIONALLY BURST? NOT INTENTIONALLY , VERY RESISTANT LESION 3. HOW MANY TIMES WAS THE BALLOON INFLATED? IF MULTIPLE TIMES, AT WHA

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 20243840 ↗

Other Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices

All Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page