Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter 596015022Recalls & reported problems
OrbusNeich Medical (ShenZhen) Co., Ltd. · Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Catheter · Class 2
All models of Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 06934955903939), received between Jul 10, 2025 and Nov 24, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation3
- Material Split, Cut or Torn2
- Material Rupture1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient5
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 24, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING LASER ATHERECTOMY, THE JADE BALLOON WAS USED IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) IN AN 80MM SEGMENT. THE BALLOON ADVANCED AND INFLATED WITH NO ISSUES, HOWEVER, THE ARTERY COULD NOT OPEN UP UPON INFLATION. SEVERAL ATTEMPTS WERE MADE AND THE SEGMENT DECREASED FROM 80MM TO 40MM, HOWEVER, COULD NOT OPEN FURTHER. DURING TREATMENT, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. WHEN THE BALLOON WAS AT THE 6F SHEATH, THE BALLOON ACCORDIONED AND UPON THE CATHETER REMOVAL, THE BALLOON MEMBRANE REMAINED IN VIVO AT THE EXTERNAL ILIAC/FEMORAL LOCATION. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO A HOSPITAL TO PERFORM SURGERY TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT. THE COMPONENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR OVERNIGHT OBSERVATION. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE WITH NO CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23640814 ↗InjuryNov 24, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING LASER ATHERECTOMY, THE JADE BALLOON WAS USED IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) IN AN 80MM SEGMENT. THE BALLOON ADVANCED AND INFLATED WITH NO ISSUES, HOWEVER, THE ARTERY COULD NOT OPEN UP UPON INFLATION. SEVERAL ATTEMPTS WERE MADE AND THE SEGMENT DECREASED FROM 80MM TO 40MM, HOWEVER, COULD NOT OPEN FURTHER. DURING TREATMENT, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. WHEN THE BALLOON WAS AT THE 6F SHEATH, THE BALLOON ACCORDIONED AND UPON THE CATHETER REMOVAL, THE BALLOON MEMBRANE REMAINED IN VIVO AT THE EXTERNAL ILIAC/FEMORAL LOCATION. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO A HOSPITAL TO PERFORM SURGERY TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT. THE COMPONENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR OVERNIGHT OBSERVATION. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE WITH NO CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23640487 ↗InjuryAug 6, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, A JADE BALLOON WAS PLACED IN PATIENT'S SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND WAS INFLATED TO 12 ATMOSPHERES. THE BALLOON RUPTURED. DURING REMOVAL, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON HAD BROKEN IN-VIVO AND BECAME COMPLETELY DETACHED. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO ADVANCE ANOTHER WIRE THROUGH THE EXISTING 6F NON-ABBOTT CONTRALATERAL SHEATH, BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO PUNCTURE THE SFA ANTEGRADE DIRECTLY BELOW THE BROKEN BALLOON. A STENT WAS PLACED WITH DIFFICULTY TO ADHERE THE BALLOON AGAINST THE WALL. THERE WAS DELAY IN THE TREATMENT AS IT ADDED 75 TO 90 MINUTES TO THE PROCEDURE WITH TWO ADDITIONAL PUNCTURES THAT WERE REQUIRED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AFTER BEDREST.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22724103 ↗InjuryAug 6, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, A JADE BALLOON WAS PLACED IN PATIENT'S SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND WAS INFLATED TO 12 ATMOSPHERES. THE BALLOON RUPTURED. DURING REMOVAL, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON HAD BROKEN IN-VIVO AND BECAME COMPLETELY DETACHED. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO ADVANCE ANOTHER WIRE THROUGH THE EXISTING 6F NON-ABBOTT CONTRALATERAL SHEATH, BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO PUNCTURE THE SFA ANTEGRADE DIRECTLY BELOW THE BROKEN BALLOON. A STENT WAS PLACED WITH DIFFICULTY TO ADHERE THE BALLOON AGAINST THE WALL. THERE WAS DELAY IN THE TREATMENT AS IT ADDED 75 TO 90 MINUTES TO THE PROCEDURE WITH TWO ADDITIONAL PUNCTURES THAT WERE REQUIRED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AFTER BEDREST.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22724080 ↗InjuryJul 10, 2025Material Rupture; Material Separation; Material Rupture; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, A JADE BALLOON WAS PLACED IN PATIENT'S SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND WAS INFLATED TO 12 ATMOSPHERES. THE BALLOON RUPTURED. DURING REMOVAL, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON HAD BROKEN IN-VIVO AND BECAME COMPLETELY DETACHED. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO ADVANCE ANOTHER WIRE THROUGH THE EXISTING 6F NON-ABBOTT CONTRALATERAL SHEATH, BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO PUNCTURE THE SFA ANTEGRADE DIRECTLY BELOW THE BROKEN BALLOON. A STENT WAS PLACED WITH DIFFICULTY TO ADHERE THE BALLOON AGAINST THE WALL. THERE WAS DELAY IN THE TREATMENT AS IT ADDED 75 TO 90 MINUTES TO THE PROCEDURE WITH TWO ADDITIONAL PUNCTURES THAT WERE REQUIRED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AFTER BEDREST.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22473161 ↗
Other Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page