Skip to content

Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter 596015022Recalls & reported problems

OrbusNeich Medical (ShenZhen) Co., Ltd. · Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Catheter · Class 2

All models of Jade PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 06934955903939), received between Jul 10, 2025 and Nov 24, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 2 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation3
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn2
  • Material Rupture1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient5
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 24, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING LASER ATHERECTOMY, THE JADE BALLOON WAS USED IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) IN AN 80MM SEGMENT. THE BALLOON ADVANCED AND INFLATED WITH NO ISSUES, HOWEVER, THE ARTERY COULD NOT OPEN UP UPON INFLATION. SEVERAL ATTEMPTS WERE MADE AND THE SEGMENT DECREASED FROM 80MM TO 40MM, HOWEVER, COULD NOT OPEN FURTHER. DURING TREATMENT, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. WHEN THE BALLOON WAS AT THE 6F SHEATH, THE BALLOON ACCORDIONED AND UPON THE CATHETER REMOVAL, THE BALLOON MEMBRANE REMAINED IN VIVO AT THE EXTERNAL ILIAC/FEMORAL LOCATION. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO A HOSPITAL TO PERFORM SURGERY TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT. THE COMPONENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR OVERNIGHT OBSERVATION. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE WITH NO CONSEQUENCES.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23640814 ↗
  • InjuryNov 24, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING LASER ATHERECTOMY, THE JADE BALLOON WAS USED IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) IN AN 80MM SEGMENT. THE BALLOON ADVANCED AND INFLATED WITH NO ISSUES, HOWEVER, THE ARTERY COULD NOT OPEN UP UPON INFLATION. SEVERAL ATTEMPTS WERE MADE AND THE SEGMENT DECREASED FROM 80MM TO 40MM, HOWEVER, COULD NOT OPEN FURTHER. DURING TREATMENT, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. WHEN THE BALLOON WAS AT THE 6F SHEATH, THE BALLOON ACCORDIONED AND UPON THE CATHETER REMOVAL, THE BALLOON MEMBRANE REMAINED IN VIVO AT THE EXTERNAL ILIAC/FEMORAL LOCATION. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO A HOSPITAL TO PERFORM SURGERY TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT. THE COMPONENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR OVERNIGHT OBSERVATION. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE WITH NO CONSEQUENCES.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23640487 ↗
  • InjuryAug 6, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, A JADE BALLOON WAS PLACED IN PATIENT'S SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND WAS INFLATED TO 12 ATMOSPHERES. THE BALLOON RUPTURED. DURING REMOVAL, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON HAD BROKEN IN-VIVO AND BECAME COMPLETELY DETACHED. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO ADVANCE ANOTHER WIRE THROUGH THE EXISTING 6F NON-ABBOTT CONTRALATERAL SHEATH, BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO PUNCTURE THE SFA ANTEGRADE DIRECTLY BELOW THE BROKEN BALLOON. A STENT WAS PLACED WITH DIFFICULTY TO ADHERE THE BALLOON AGAINST THE WALL. THERE WAS DELAY IN THE TREATMENT AS IT ADDED 75 TO 90 MINUTES TO THE PROCEDURE WITH TWO ADDITIONAL PUNCTURES THAT WERE REQUIRED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AFTER BEDREST.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22724103 ↗
  • InjuryAug 6, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, A JADE BALLOON WAS PLACED IN PATIENT'S SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND WAS INFLATED TO 12 ATMOSPHERES. THE BALLOON RUPTURED. DURING REMOVAL, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON HAD BROKEN IN-VIVO AND BECAME COMPLETELY DETACHED. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO ADVANCE ANOTHER WIRE THROUGH THE EXISTING 6F NON-ABBOTT CONTRALATERAL SHEATH, BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO PUNCTURE THE SFA ANTEGRADE DIRECTLY BELOW THE BROKEN BALLOON. A STENT WAS PLACED WITH DIFFICULTY TO ADHERE THE BALLOON AGAINST THE WALL. THERE WAS DELAY IN THE TREATMENT AS IT ADDED 75 TO 90 MINUTES TO THE PROCEDURE WITH TWO ADDITIONAL PUNCTURES THAT WERE REQUIRED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AFTER BEDREST.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22724080 ↗
  • InjuryJul 10, 2025Material Rupture; Material Separation; Material Rupture; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, A JADE BALLOON WAS PLACED IN PATIENT'S SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND WAS INFLATED TO 12 ATMOSPHERES. THE BALLOON RUPTURED. DURING REMOVAL, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON HAD BROKEN IN-VIVO AND BECAME COMPLETELY DETACHED. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO ADVANCE ANOTHER WIRE THROUGH THE EXISTING 6F NON-ABBOTT CONTRALATERAL SHEATH, BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO PUNCTURE THE SFA ANTEGRADE DIRECTLY BELOW THE BROKEN BALLOON. A STENT WAS PLACED WITH DIFFICULTY TO ADHERE THE BALLOON AGAINST THE WALL. THERE WAS DELAY IN THE TREATMENT AS IT ADDED 75 TO 90 MINUTES TO THE PROCEDURE WITH TWO ADDITIONAL PUNCTURES THAT WERE REQUIRED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AFTER BEDREST.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22473161 ↗

Other Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices

All Catheter, Angioplasty, Peripheral, Transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page