Skip to content

NanoTack CAT01858Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · NANOTACK SUTURE ANCHOR 1.4MM WITH FLEX INSERTER · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Stryker NanoTack suture anchor is a small plastic anchor, with a flexible inserter, used to attach sutures to bone in minimally invasive joint procedures. The 55 reports mostly describe the anchor or its inserter breaking during surgery, sometimes leaving fragments in the joint or embedded in bone, plus anchors being past their expiration date. Four reports involve injuries and no deaths are described. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
55
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 55 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252633099), received between Jun 11, 2018 and Dec 30, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 51 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (37 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K131769); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 2 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break37
  • Expiration Date Error11
  • Material Fragmentation5
  • Material Deformation4
  • Fracture2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions42
  • Insufficient Information13
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient9
  • Foreign Body In Patient4
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 55 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 30, 2025Expiration Date Error; Expiration Date Error

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EXPIRED NANOTACK FLEX ANCHOR WAS OPENED AND IMPLANTED INTO A PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23926646 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025Break; Material Fragmentation; Break; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NANOTACK GUIDE WAS PLACED ON THE ACETABULAR RIM. A NANOTACK DRILL WAS SUCCESSFULLY USED TO CREATE PILOT HOLE WITHOUT AND PROBLEMS. ANCHOR WAS INTRODUCED TO GUIDE AND MALLETED INTO BONE. TRIGGER ARMS ON ANCHOR WERE DEPLOYED, AND GUIDE WAS PULLED FROM JOINT. UPON THE REMOVAL OF THE NANOTACK GUIDE MULTIPLE PEEK FRAGMENTS OF THE NANOTACK FLEX ANCHOR WERE PROTRUDING FROM ACETABULAR RIM. MAJORITY OF ANCHOR REMAINED IN THE BONE BUT ABOUT 30% OF ANCHOR BODY FRAGMENTED INTO THE JOINT. THESE PIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE JOINT SPACE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22956868 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025Break; Material Fragmentation; Break; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON DEPLOYMENT OF THE ANCHOR AND REMOVAL OF THE GUIDE, THE PEEK PORTION OF THE NANOTACK ANCHOR WERE PROTRUDING FROM THE JOINT. THE FRAGMENTED PIECES WERE PULLED FROM THE JOINT AND THE SUTURE PORTION PULLED OUT OF THE LEFTOVER ANCHOR AND OUT OF THE JOINT SPACE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22956858 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 20, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER SURGEON UNRAVELED THE SUTURE ON THE INSERTER, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE FLEXIBLE INSERTER FROM THE ANCHOR HAD BROKEN OFF DISTALLY. THE SURGEON PULLED BACK ON THE INSERTER AND DRILL GUIDE TO PULL THE BROKEN IMPLANT OUT BUT A PIECE OF THE ANCHOR INSERTER BROKE OFF. WITH THE HELP OF X-RAY, THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE FLOATING PIECE IN THE CAPSULE. THE SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE PIECE OF METAL FROM THE INSERTER THAT WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE BONE, SO THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO BUR DOWN FLAT WITH THE BONE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22057651 ↗
  • InjuryApr 4, 2025Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NANOTACK FLEX ANCHORS HAVE BEEN UNCOILING WHILE REMOVING THE INSERTION HANDLE AND REPORTEDLY CAUSING WEAK POINTS TO OCCUR. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INSERTER BROKE UPON ANCHOR DEPLOYMENT AND INSERTER WAS NOT ABLE TO BE REMOVED FROM PATIENT ANATOMY. REPORTEDLY SURGEON WAS NOT WORRIED ABOUT FURTHER HARM.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 21775972 ↗
  • InjuryDec 17, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT "THE TIP OF THE NANO TACK ANCHOR MECHANISM BROKE WHEN BEING MALLETED INTO THE BONE. THE SURGEON NOTED THAT SOME OF THE MECHANISM WOULD BE LEFT IMBEDDED IN THE PATIENTS' BONE AS THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO RETRIEVE IT AFTER THE ANCHOR WENT IN".

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 20951709 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 31, 2024Material Fragmentation; Separation Failure; Material Fragmentation; Separation Failure

    PER INVESTIGATION RESULTS, THE ANCHOR WAS BROKEN. BASED ON THIS, THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE BROKEN PIECE WAS NOT LEFT IN PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18619853 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 10, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18112730 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981451 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981450 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981449 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981448 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981447 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981411 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981410 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981408 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981407 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16981406 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16980253 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16980246 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16753869 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 11, 2023Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16718718 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16677634 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2023Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE INITIAL REPORT'S TYPE OF REPORTABLE EVENT WAS A MALFUNCTION FOR THE ANCHOR BREAKING. HOWEVER PER INVESTIGATION RESULTS, THERE WAS NO ANCHOR BREAKAGE, THE ANCHOR WAS ONLY BENT. THEREFORE THIS EVENT IS NOT REPORTABLE AS THERE WAS NO BREAKING OF THE ANCHOR.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16620779 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2023Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR BROKE DURING PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16620768 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K131769. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2645-2023 · Aug 23, 2023 · Open, Classified
    Cinchlock SS Knotless Anchor Inserter, Part Number CAT02462
  • Z-1634-2016 · Apr 12, 2016 · Terminated
    CinchLock SS Knotless Anchor with Inserter; Model number CAT02462; Orthopedic: The Pivot CinchLock SS Knotless Anchor (CAT02462) and Pivot CinchLock Flex Knotless Anchor (CAT0246

Other FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices

All FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page