V40 Head 6260-5-126Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · V40 Femoral Head · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V40 Head (30)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327012859), received between Mar 20, 2019 and Mar 9, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information3
- Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Difficult to Insert1
Patient problems
- Injury2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Reaction1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 9, 2021Difficult to Insert; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Insert; Device-Device Incompatibility
THE TAPER LOCK DID NOT WORK WHEN THE INNER HEAD IS ATTACHED. EVEN THOUGH IT WAS DRIVEN IN, IT CAN BE EASILY DETACHED BE HAND. SO ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11445095 ↗MalfunctionJul 10, 2019Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A BHA, A HEAD DID NOT SLIDE SMOOTHLY ON THE SLIDING SURFACE OF THE REPORTED CENTRAX. SPARE HEAD AND CENTRAX WERE USED INSTEAD.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8775520 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE EXPLANTING OF BIPOLAR WAS PERFORMED DUE TO THE SUSPICION OF METAL ALLERGY. A LARGE AMOUNT OF LUMPY TISSUE EMERGED FROM THE HIP OF THE PATIENT. THE CUSTOMER WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THE AMOUNT OF POLYETHYLENE WEAR. EVENT UPDATE PER REVIEW OF THE CLINICIAN'S COMMENT: "REJECTED FOR MEDICAL REVIEW - SPACER NOTED ON X-RAY INDICATES INFECTION, HOWEVER, CANNOT CONFIRM INFECTION OR REPORTED EVENT.
Patient problems: Injury; Reaction
MAUDE report 8592157 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE BHA WAS DONE WITH CENTRAX BIPOLAR CUP, V40 HEAD AND ACCOLADE 2 STEM AT (B)(6) 2018 FOR FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE. AT (B)(6) 2018, INFECTION WAS OCCURRED AND THE SURGEON CLEANED THE SURGICAL FIELD, EXCHANGED THE HEAD AND CUP. THE STEM WAS NOT CHANGED. AT (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT WAS RECOVERED. INFECTION WAS CONFIRMED CLINICALLY, MICROORGANISM UNKNOWN. PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS: "STOMACH CANCER"; RIGHT SIDE.
Patient problems: Injury; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8436280 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish devices
- Arcos Modular Revision Hip System 11-301310Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish1 recall9 reports
- Arcos Modular Revision Hip System 11-301342Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish1 recall4 reports
- Tritanium 502-03-52DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish39 reports
- V40 Head 6260-5-332Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish12 reports
- EXETER 0580-1-443Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish11 reports
- V40 Head 6260-9-032Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish11 reports
- Trident 509-02-56EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish10 reports
- Taperloc Complete Primary Femoral 51-104180Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous cemented, osteophilic finish9 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page