LITe PEDICLE BASED RETRACTOR 48760631CRecalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · MEDIAL ARM, PEDICLE BASED RETRACTOR · Class 1
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327135473), received between Nov 8, 2016 and Aug 10, 2020 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture3
- Break2
- Material Integrity Problem2
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 10, 2020Fracture; Material Deformation; Fracture; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SECURING MECHANISM OF A LITE PEDICLE BASE RETRACTOR MEDIAL ARM ASSEMBLY WAS "SPINNING IN THE VOID" INTRA-OPERATIVELY. SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH NO DELAY. NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10385032 ↗MalfunctionDec 27, 2016Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MEDIAL ARM BROKE DURING SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6205913 ↗MalfunctionNov 8, 2016Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; MEDIAL ARM OF RETRACTOR BROKE AND RENDERED USELESS. "PULLING" MECHANISM OF MEDIAL ARM SCREW BROKE AND MADE THE ARM UNABLE TO LOCK IN PLACE WHEN RETRACTED MEDIALLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6087094 ↗
Other RETRACTOR devices
- Endo Paddle Retract 173046Covidien LP · RETRACTOR56 reports
- Omni-Tract® 4040Integra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall3 reports
- RadiaLux™ 50-101-1Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- Omni-Tract® 11275Integra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- CHARNLEY 9620-04-000Depuy International Ltd · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- NA 2176-10-000Depuy (Ireland) · RETRACTOR51 reports
- Fathom MR2-102050Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall1 report
- Omni-Tract® 3104RIntegra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page