Skip to content

Neuroform Atlas M003UZAS40240Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · WITHOUT TIP Stent System · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Neuroform Atlas (18)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327382167), received between Mar 5, 2021 and Apr 1, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Activation” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Activation4
  • Activation Failure1
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Obstruction/Occlusion1
  • Ruptured Aneurysm1
  • Stroke/CVA1
  • Thromboembolism1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 1, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, THE LEFT P1 OCCLUSION WAS OBSERVED AS IT WAS TREATED WITH INTRA-ARTERIAL EPTIFIBATIDE AND SECOND STENT WAS PLACED IN THE P1. THE EVENT WAS RESOLVED, WITHOUT SEQUELAE. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Obstruction/Occlusion

    MAUDE report 21749060 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 7, 2024Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SUBJECT STENT WAS DETACHED IN DISTAL PART OF CATHETER. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20873539 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT STENT WAS NOT ON THE DELIVERY WIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20787763 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 29, 2024Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT STENT DETACHED FROM THE DELIVERY WIRE INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20560173 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 19, 2023Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    THE STENT (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS, AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE STENT (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS RETURNED DEPLOYED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16212085 ↗
  • DeathMar 5, 2021Activation Failure; Migration; Activation Failure; Migration

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUEST MDR 2400040000-2021-8011-FDA LETTER.MSG AND MEDWATCH UF/IMPORTER REPORT #2400040000-2021-8011 REVIEWED ON 09-FEB-2021 REPORTED THAT DURING AN ELECTIVE STENT ASSISTED COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE OF THE RIGHT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (R ICA) ANEURYSM ON A 36 YEAR OLD FEMALE PATIENT, THE SUBJECT STENT HAD A COLLAPSED END AFTER DEPLOYMENT. WHEN ANEURYSM COILING WAS ATTEMPTED, THE SUBJECT STENT DEFORMED AND LED TO AN INABILITY TO EMBOLIZE THE ANEURYSM AND SUBSEQUENT ANEURYSMAL RUPTURE. PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT NOTHING OCCURRED DURING THE CASE THAT WOULD EXPLAIN THE MALFUNCTION. THE PHYSICIAN PLACED A BALLOON EXPANDABLE STENT, AFTER ATTEMPTS TO RETRIEVE THE SUBJECT STENT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. SHEATHS WERE REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN LEFT IN PLACE BUT IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT THIS MEANS. THE PROCEDURE WAS ALSO COMPLICATED BY SUBSEQUENT RIGHT POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (R PCA) AND RIGHT SUPERIOR CEREBELLAR ARTERY (R SCA) INFARCTION, WHICH WERE DIFFERENT VESSELS THAN THE ONE TREATED. IN THE PHYSICIAN¿S OPINION, THE INFARCTION WAS DUE TO FORMATION OF PLATELET CLOT IN THE COLLAPSED END OF THE SUBJECT STENT AND ITS MIGRATION INTO THE POSTERIOR CEREBRAL CIRCULATION VIA THE POS

    Patient problems: Ruptured Aneurysm; Stroke/CVA; Thromboembolism

    MAUDE report 11426290 ↗

Other Intracranial coil-assist stent devices

All Intracranial coil-assist stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page