Skip to content

Sample supply unit 09793178001Recalls & reported problems

Roche Diagnostics GmbH · Class 1

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613336220146), received between May 14, 2024 and Jan 15, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Non Reproducible Results” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Non Reproducible Results2
  • High Test Results1
  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings1
  • Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 15, 2026Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Output Problem; Non Reproducible Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THEY RECEIVED DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED WITH THE SODIUM ELECTRODE ON A COBAS C 303 ANALYTICAL UNIT. THE SAMPLE INITIALLY RESULTED IN A SODIUM VALUE OF 125 MMOL/L. THE RESULT DID NOT MATCH THE PATIENT'S HISTORY, SO THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON A SECOND ANALYZER. THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 133 MMOL/L AND WAS DEEMED CORRECT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24077913 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 10, 2025High Test Results; High Test Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER NOTICED QC FOR BILT3 BILIRUBIN TOTAL GEN.3 (BILT3) TRENDING HIGHER ON THEIR COBAS PURE SAMPLE SUPPLY UNIT. THE CUSTOMER REPLACED THE REAGENT PACK AND REPEATED 6-8 PATIENT SAMPLES. A DISCREPANT HIGH BILT3 RESULT WAS PROVIDED FOR 1 PATIENT SAMPLE. THE INITIAL RESULT WAS 1.9 MG/DL. THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 0.2 MG/DL. THE REPEAT RESULT WAS BELIEVED TO BE CORRECT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23769332 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 14, 2024Non Reproducible Results; Non Reproducible Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER QUESTIONED THE RESULTS FOR ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS MAGNESIUM REAGENT (MG2), CREATINE, AND ALT FOR MULTIPLE PATIENT SAMPLES TESTED ON A COBAS PURE INSTRUMENT. THE CUSTOMER PROVIDED EXAMPLES OF DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR 2 PATIENT SAMPLES TESTED FOR MG2. PATIENT 1 INITIAL RESULT WAS 3.2 MG/DL. THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 2.3 MG/DL. PATIENT 2 INITIAL RESULT WAS 2.9 MG/DL. THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 2.0 MG/DL. THE SAMPLES WERE REPEATED AS THE INITIAL RESULTS DID NOT CORRESPOND TO THE PATIENT¿S CLINICAL HISTORY. THE REPEAT RESULTS WERE BELIEVED TO BE CORRECT. THE QUESTIONABLE RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19313173 ↗

Other ANALYZER, CHEMISTRY (PHOTOMETRIC, DISCRETE), FOR CLINICAL USE devices

All ANALYZER, CHEMISTRY (PHOTOMETRIC, DISCRETE), FOR CLINICAL USE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page