Skip to content

Passeo-18 2.5/150/130Recalls & reported problems

Biotronik AG · Class 2

All models of Passeo-18 (54)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640130414723), received between Jul 1, 2021 and Sep 23, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Material Rupture2
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Fracture1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Material Puncture/Hole1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2025Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    THE PASSEO-18 PERIPHERAL BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 70% STENOSIS DEGREE. THE DEVICE WAS DELIVERED TO THE LESION BUT COULD NOT BE INFLATED. IT WAS NOTICED AFTER WITHDRAWAL THAT THE BALLOON WAS BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23119634 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 18, 2024Fracture; Difficult to Remove; Material Deformation; Fracture; Difficult to Remove; Material Deformation

    THE PASSEO-18 PERIPHERAL BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT OF A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION (80 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE) IN THE SEVERELY TORTUOUS MID PART OF THE SFA. AFTER DILATATION, THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN OVER THE V18 GUIDE WIRE. THE ENTIRE SYSTEM WAS REMOVED, AND ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19557066 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 11, 2023Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    THE PASSEO-18 BALLOON CATHETER WAS CHOSEN FOR TREATMENT. IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO PRE-DILATE A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 90 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE IN THE RIGHT SFA. THE PASSEO-18 WAS ADVANCED TO THE LESION BUT COULD NOT FURTHER BE INFLATED WHEN THE PRESSURE REACHED 3 ATM. TWO OTHER PASSEO-18 BALLOONS WERE USED AFTERWARDS, BUT BOTH ALSO RUPTURED (FILED SEPARATELY).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17298505 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 11, 2023Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    THE PASSEO-18 BALLOON CATHETER WAS CHOSEN FOR TREATMENT. IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO PRE-DILATE A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 90 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE IN THE RIGHT SFA. TWO PASSEO-18 WAS ADVANCED TO THE LESION BUT COULD NOT FURTHER BE INFLATED WHEN THE PRESSURE REACHED 3 ATM (REPORTED SEPARATELY). THE 3RD PASSEO-18 BALLOON (COMPLAINT DEVICE) WAS USED AFTERWARDS, BUT ALSO RUPTURED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17298488 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 27, 2023Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    THE PASSEO-18 BALLOON CATHETER WAS CHOSEN FOR TREATMENT, BUT THE LESION COULD NOT BE CROSSED WITH THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17214028 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 14, 2021Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole

    A PASSEO-18 BALLOON CATHETER WAS CHOSEN FOR TREATMENT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION. AFTER PASSING THE V-18 GUIDEWIRE THROUGH THE LESION TO THE DISTAL END OF THE ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY, A SERIOUS STENOSIS OF ABOUT 30MM WAS DETECTED. THE PASSEO-18 WAS INTRODUCED AND INFLATED UP TO 10BAR. HOWEVER, THE IMAGES SHOWED A LEAKAGE OF CONTRAST MEDIUM AND UPON WITHDRAWAL OF THE BALLOON, A PINHOLE WAS DETECTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13003101 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 1, 2021Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    A PASSEO-18 BALLOON CATHETER WAS CHOSEN FOR TREATMENT OF A MILDLY CALCIFIED LESION (80 PERCENT STENOSIS DEGREE) IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS POSTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. AFTER INFLATION THE BALLOON COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THE BALLOON WAS STUCK WITH THE WIRE AND THE WIRE COULD NOT BE REMOVE FROM THE BALLOON. THUS, THE WHOLE SYSTEM (BALLOON WITH WIRE) WERE REMOVED TOGETHER FROM THE SHEATH.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12099145 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page