Skip to content

SMR System 1304.15.180Recalls & reported problems

Limacorporate SPA · SMR System - Finned Stem Dia. 18 mm L. 80 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of SMR System (47)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08033390270816), received between Feb 20, 2026 and Apr 2, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Medical device site infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 2, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    TOTAL SHOULDER REVISION SURGERY OF AN SMR ANATOMIC PROSTHESIS WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026, DUE TO INFECTION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE HUMERAL HEAD PROSTHESIS, ANATOMIC BODY PROSTHESIS, POLY ANATOMIC LINER, BASEPLATE SCREWS, BASEPLATE, AND HUMERAL STEM WERE EXPLANTED, AND AN ANTIBIOTIC-LOADED CEMENT SPACER WAS IMPLANTED. THE FOLLOWING PRODUCTS WERE REPORTED AS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT AND EXPLANTED: · SMR CEMENTLESS FINNED STEM (PRODUCT CODE 1304.15.180, BATCH NO. 0300869, STERILIZATION NO. (B)(4)). · SMR ECC. ADAPTOR TAPER STANDARD (PRODUCT CODE 1330.15.274, BATCH NO. 0301405, STERILIZATION NO. (B)(4)). · SMR FINNED HUMERAL BODY (PRODUCT CODE 1350.15.110, BATCH NO. 0301593, STERILIZATION NO. (B)(4)). · SMR UNCEMENT. GLENOID # STD (PRODUCT CODE 1375.20.010 BATCH NO. 0302079, STERILIZATION NO. (B)(4)). ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINT SOURCE, THE INFECTION ORIGINATED FROM A WOUND AND SUBSEQUENTLY INVOLVED THE JOINT. THE EXACT DATE OF THE PREVIOUS SURGERY IS UNKNOWN; HOWEVER, THE DEVICES HAD REPORTEDLY REMAINED IN SITU FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 TO 15 YEARS. EVENT HAPPENED IN AUSTRALIA

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24763575 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 25, 2026Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    SECOND STAGE REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON JANUARY 6TH 2026 IN A TWO STAGE REVISION. ORIGINAL SURGERY IS UNKNOWN, AS WELL AS FIRST STAGE REVISION SURGERY DATE AND REASON. PATIENT ORIGINALLY HAD A LIMA ANATOMIC SHOULDER PROSTHESIS WITH CEMENTED 3-PEGGED GLENOID. PRIOR REVISION WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE GLENOID AND THE DEFECT WAS PACKED WITH BONE GRAFT. DURING CURRENT REVISION, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO CONVERT THE PROSTHESIS TO A REVERSE CONFIGURATION EXPLANTING THE ORIGINAL SMR TRAUMA HUM. BODY # MEDIUM (PART NUMBER 1350.15.010), NEUTRAL ADAPTOR TAPER STANDARD ((PART NUMBER 1330.15.270) AND SMR HUMERAL HEAD Ø48 MM (PART NUMBER 1322.09.480), BUT THE REVERSE BODY WAS DEEMED TO BE TOO PROUD TO REDUCE THE SHOULDER, THEREFORE THE SMR CEMENTLESS FINNED STEM (PART NUMBER 1304.15.180) WAS REPLACED WITH A TORNIER REVIVE STEM. PRIMA TT COMPONENTS WERE SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED ON THE GLENOID SIDE. THE PATIENT IS MALE, DATE OF BIRTH (B)(6) 1946. THE EVENT OCCURRED IN THE UNITED STATES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24442715 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 20, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem

    AN SMR REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026, DUE TO IMPLANT LOOSENING. ACCORDING TO THE SOURCE OF THECOMPLAINT, DURING THE REVISION PROCEDURE THE GLENOSPHERE AND HUMERAL COMPONENTS WERE EXPLANTED AND REPLACED, AND A LONGCEMENTED STEM (14 × 180 MM) WAS IMPLANTED.THE FOLLOWING DEVICES WERE EXPLANTED IN THE PROCEDURE:· SMR CEMENTLESS FINNED STEM (PRODUCT CODE 1304.15.180, LOT #2114810 - STER. 2100272) SOLD IN US· SMR REVERSE FINNED HUMERAL BODY (PRODUCT CODE 1352.15.050, LOT #2124196 - STER. 2100381)· SMR REVERSE LINER STANDARD (PRODUCT CODE 1360.50.010, LOT #21AT03G - STER. 2100194)· SMR ECCENTRIC GLENOSPHERE Ø 36 MM (PRODUCT CODE 1376.09.031, LOT #2009277 - STER. 2000208)THE PREVIOUS SHOULDER SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON(B)(6) 2022.THE PATIENT IS A 73-YEAR-OLD MALE.EVENT HAPPENED IN AUSTRALIA.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24401879 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Hemi-, Humeral, Metallic Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Shoulder, Hemi-, Humeral, Metallic Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page