Skip to content

Admiral™ Xtreme ADM060250130LRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · CATH ADM060250130L ADM US 06L250 UL1300 · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08033477064376), received between Jun 3, 2022 and May 11, 2023 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 11, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE A  ADMIRAL EXTREME TO TREAT A LESION IN THE MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. DEGREE OF TORTUOSITY WAS NONE. DEGREE OF CALCIFICATION WAS NONE. EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS NOT USED. A 50/50 CONTRAST/HEP SALINE INFLATION FLUID WAS USED. BALLOON INFLATED ONLY ONCE WITH AN INFLATION DEVICE. DEVICE PREPPED PER THE IFU. THE DEVICE PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY-DEPLOYED STENT. NO RESISTANCE ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS BALLOON BURST DURING INFLATION. THE BALLOON DID NOT FRAGMENT. THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED, WITH NO COMPLICATIONS. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16911197 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 3, 2022Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE AN ADMIRAL XTREME PTA DURING PROCEDURE TO TREAT A LESION IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). NO EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS USED. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING BALLOON INFLATION, BURST/LEAK/RUPTURE OCCURRED AT 8ATM. EVERYTHING CAME OUT TOGETHER DURING REMOVAL. A NEW BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL TREATMENT OR INTERVENTION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14587611 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page