Skip to content

Pacific™ Plus PCP070040150Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · CATH PCP070040150 PLUS US D7L40UL1500 · Class 2

All models of Pacific Plus (25)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08033477072906), received between Nov 18, 2024 and Nov 18, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 18, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A 2.5X60MM PACIFIC PLUS PTA BALLOON DURING TREATMENT OF THE PATIENT¿S COMMON ILIAC VEIN (CIV) & EXTERNAL ILIAC VEIN (EIV). THE DEVICE WAS PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. AN INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED. 50/50 CONTRAST INFLATIONFLUID WAS USED. TRACKING DIFFICULTY DURING INITIAL ADVANCEMENT WAS REPORTED. MODERATE RESISTANCE WAS NOTED, OTHER BALLOON (BARD ATLAS) WAS UNABLE TO CROSS THE LESION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 2.5X60MM PACIFIC PLUS BALLOON GOT STUCK ON AN 018 NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE AND WAS SAFELY REMOVED WITH THE WIRE FROM THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN THEN ATTEMPTED TO USE A 7X40MM PACIFIC PLUS PTA BALLOON. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 7X40MM PACIFIC PLUS GOT STUCK AND DETACHED AT THE TARGET LESION AS THEY TRIED TO REMOVE IT. ONLY A PARTIAL PIECE OF THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED. THE DETACHED COMPONENT WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. PHYSICIAN THEN ATTEMPTED TO USE A NANOCROSS ELITE PTA BALLOON TO PULL OUT THE DETACHED 7X40MM PACIFIC PLUS BUT THE NANOCROSS ELITE ALSO GOT STUCK AND DETACHED, THE NANOCROSS WAS REMOVED WITH A SNARE. THE DETACHED NANOCROSS ELITE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED. THE PATIENT MAY NEED SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO REMOVE T

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 20706732 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page