Skip to content

Percuflex™ Urinary Diversion Stent Set M0061602150Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Urinary Diversion Stent Set · Class U · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729297185), received between Feb 10, 2017 and Jun 23, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Unsealed Device Packaging1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 23, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PERCUFLEX URINARY DIVERSION STENT WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT. POST PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT WAS FRAGMENTED INTO PIECES WHILE IT WAS BEING REMOVED. THERE WAS NO INFORMATION IF A NEW STENT WAS IMPLANTED AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22312352 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 31, 2023Unsealed Device Packaging; Unsealed Device Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC THAT AN PERCUFLEX URINARY DIVERSION STENT SET WAS RECEIVED ON AUGUST 07, 2023. IT WAS FOUND THAT THE STENT ARRIVED IN THE FACILITY DAMAGED. IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE PACKAGING WAS SOMEHOW AFFECTED BY HEAT. THE STERILE BARRIER WAS COMPROMISED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, AND THIS DEVICE WAS NOT USED IN A PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17660668 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 10, 2017Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A PERCUFLEX¿ URINARY DIVERSION STENT SET WAS USED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2016. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE STENT'S PIGTAIL DETACHED AS THE SURGEON WENT TO THREAD IT OVER THE GUIDE WIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER PERCUFLEX¿ URINARY DIVERSION STENT SET. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE FINE. THIS EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED A REPORTABLE EVENT BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION RESULTS; STENT BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6321220 ↗

Other CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY devices

All CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page