Flexima™ Nasobiliary Catheter M00540130Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Nasobiliary Catheter · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729337393), received between Jul 14, 2021 and Sep 3, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Material Split, Cut or Torn2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Leak/Splash1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Fever1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 3, 2026Leak/Splash; Material Split, Cut or Torn
It was reported to Boston Scientific Corporation that a Flexima Nasobiliary Catheter was used for dilation of the intra and extrahepatic bile ducts with stone removal in the descending duodenum during an Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage (ENBD), and biliary stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2026. Following the procedure, the patient's jaundice worsened. Subsequent Computed tomography imaging demonstrated dislodgement of the ENBD drainage tube and prolapse of the biliary stent.On (b)(6) 2026, the patient underwent a repeat ERCP with ENBD placement and biliary stent replacement; however, no clinical improvement was observed. The originally placed nasobiliary drainage tube was removed using foreign body forceps. A follow-up CT scan performed on (b)(6) 2026, assessed the ENBD and biliary stent placement. Further CT imaging performed thereafter was reviewed with the Radiology Department, which confirmed that the drainage tube remained in situ, with the distal tip of the ENBD located in the lower common bile duct. On the same day, the attending physician performed a bedside saline flush of the ENBD tube and identified a cra
Patient problems: Fever; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50600072 ↗InjuryJun 25, 2026Break; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A FLEXIMA NASOBILIARY CATHETER WAS INTENDED TO BE IMPLANTED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT TO TREAT JAUNDICE AND LOWER ABDOMINAL PAIN DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE WITH STONE REMOVAL PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE NASOBILIARY DRAINAGE CATHETER FRACTURED AFTER IT HAD BEEN INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT. THE FRACTURED SEGMENT REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S COMMON BILE DUCT AND WAS DIFFICULT TO RETRIEVE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULTS OF THIS EVENT AND THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25630754 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A FLEXIMA NASOBILIARY CATHETER WAS USED IN THE DUODENAL PAPILLA TO TREAT COMMON BILE DUCT STONES DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026. DURING PREPARATION, THE TIP WAS CRACKED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NOTE: A PHOTO OF THE DEVICE WAS PROVIDED WHEREIN A TORN/SPLIT IS SHOWN AT THE TIP OF THE STENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25211218 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2025Break; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Break; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A NASOBILIARY CATHETER WAS TO BE IMPLANTED TO TREAT A BILE DUCT TUMOR IN THE GALLSTONES DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) WITH ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY (EST) INVOLVING THE EXTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCT (EHBD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2025. DURING PREPARATION PRIOR TO PROCEDURE THE FRONT END WAS FRACTURED WHEN IT WAS UNPACKED. ANOTHER NASOBILIARY CATHETER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23771629 ↗MalfunctionJul 14, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A FLEXIMA NASOBILIARY CATHETER WAS USED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE IN THE CALCULUS OF BILE DUCT PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2021. DURING PREPARATION, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PIG TAIL END WAS DETACHED AND COULD NOT BE USED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER FLEXIMA NASOBILIARY CATHETER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12165400 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page