Skip to content

UroMax Ultra Kit M0062251200Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Balloon Dilatation Catheter Kit · Class 2

All models of UroMax Ultra Kit (14)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729341277), received between Nov 2, 2017 and Oct 15, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 5, 2025Class IIOpen, Classified

    The Encore 26 Inflation Device is used with balloon dilation catheters to create and monitor pressure in the balloon and to deflate the balloon. An internal investigation determined that during use, foreign material particles could migrate from affected Encore 26 Inflation Devices into a balloon dilatation catheter.

    Z-2536-2025 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel2
  • Device Packaging Compromised1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2024Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT UROMAX ULTRA DILATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE WAS USED DURING A URETEROSCOPY AND BALLOON BURST. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING AN ALTERNATE METHOD. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20456300 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 4, 2022Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON CATHETER WAS USED IN THE LOWER URINARY TRACT DURING A TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY (TUL) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING PREPARATION, THE BALLOON RUPTURED WHEN FUNCTIONAL CHECKING WAS PERFORMED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON CATHETER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14274690 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 2, 2017Device Packaging Compromised; Device Packaging Compromised

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX BALLOON KIT WAS USED IN THE URETER DURING A URINARY TRACT DILATION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING UNPACKING, THEY NOTED THAT THE STERILE BAG OF THE INFLATOR WAS ALREADY OPENED COMPROMISING THE STERILE BARRIER. REPORTEDLY, THIS DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. THE PATIENT¿S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6995925 ↗

Other DILATOR, URETHRAL devices

All DILATOR, URETHRAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page