Skip to content

Coyote™ ES H74939134354010Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of Coyote ES (26)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729767442), received between May 10, 2021 and Jul 10, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Entrapment of Device1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2024Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REPORTABLE BASED ON THE DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 18JUN2024. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON WOULD NOT LOAD INTO THE WIRE. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT LEG VESSEL. A 3.5MM X 40MM X 145CM COYOTE ES BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE. WHILE ATTEMPTING INSERTION, THE BALLOON FAILED TO LOAD ONTO THE WIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED GUIDEWIRE LUMEN IS STRETCHED AND SEPARATED 7.8CM FROM THE TIP.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19710071 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2021Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT CATHETER AND GUIDEWIRE ENTRAPMENT, PAIN AND ABORTED PROCEDURE OCCURRED. THE 100% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY CALCIFIED DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. A 3.5MM X 40MM X 145CM COYOTE ES BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. THE BALLOON WAS DEPLOYED; HOWEVER, DURING WITHDRAWAL, THE PHYSICIAN COULD NOT REMOVE THE BALLOON OVER THE CHOICE GUIDEWIRE. THE BALLOON AND THE WIRE WERE ENTIRELY REMOVED AS ONE UNIT. THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO ABORT THE PROCEDURE BECAUSE THE PATIENT WAS HAVING SO MUCH BACK PAIN. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE PATIENT WILL RETURN AT A LATER DATE TO BE TREATED WITH ATHERECTOMY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 11797607 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page