Advanix™ Biliary M00533260Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Biliary Stent · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Advanix Biliary (59)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729786634), received between Nov 12, 2018 and Dec 13, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Break2
- Migration2
- Material Deformation1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- Perforation2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 13, 2023Break; Material Deformation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Break; Material Deformation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE BILIARY DRAINAGE (ERBD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. DURING THE PROCEDURE AND INSIDE THE PATIENT, THE STENT WAS KINKED. THERE WERE NO KNOWN PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NOTE: THIS EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED A REPORTABLE EVENT BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION RESULTS WHICH REVEALED THE STENT BARB WAS TORN. PLEASE SEE BLOCK H10 FOR FULL INVESTIGATION DETAILS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18317521 ↗InjurySep 22, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Migration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX-NAVIFLEX BILIARY STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 FOR TREATMENT/DRAINAGE OF LIVER CYST. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED CORRECTLY, A LITTLE FAR OUT OF THE AMPULLA IN THE DUODENUM AND COMPLETED AT FOUR THIRTY IN THE AFTERNOON. AT TWO O'CLOCK IN THE MORNING, POST PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD A DUODENAL PERFORATION AND WAS SENT BACK TO SURGERY. BASED ON THE PATIENT'S CHART, THE PATIENT HAD A SMALL FOCAL PERFORATION OF THE DUODENUM RESULTING FROM A STENT MIGRATION AT THE JUNCTION OF THE SECOND AND THIRD PORTION OF THE DUODENUM. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO CLOSE THE DUODENAL PERFORATION. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE AS "OKAY WITH NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED".
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 12511510 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2021Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS USED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT, PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. THE STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED WITHOUT ANY ISSUES. DURING ROUTINE FOLLOW-UP, ON (B)(6) 2021, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT HAD MIGRATED DISTALLY INTO THE DUODENAL WALL AND INTO THE COLON. THE PERFORATED DUODENUM WAS CLIPPED AND THE MIGRATED STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED USING A PAIR OF FORCEPS AND NO NEW STENT WAS IMPLANTED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE "FULLY RECOVERED".
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 11668594 ↗InjuryNov 12, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS REMOVED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PERFORMED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT ON (B)(6) 2018. ON (B)(6) 2018 THE PATIENT HAD THE ADVANIX BILIARY STENT IMPLANTED IN THE CBD WITH NO ISSUES REPORTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, ON (B)(6) 2018 DURING THE SCHEDULED STENT REMOVAL PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE ADVANIX BILIARY STENT USING A STANDARD POLYPECTOMY SNARE, PIECES APPEARED TO STRIP AWAY WITH MINOR RETRACTION OF THE SNARE. THE STENT TORE TANGENTIALLY ALONG ITS LENGTH FROM THE DISTAL FLANGE TO THE DISTAL TIP. THE PHYSICIAN MANAGED TO GRAB THE REMAINING STENT BODY AND REMOVE THIS WITH THE SNARE, ALONG WITH THE TORN OFF SECTION. ALL BROKEN PIECES OF STENT WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE OK FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATION AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8059456 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page