Skip to content

Advanix™ Biliary M00533380Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Biliary Stent · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Advanix Biliary (59)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729786757), received between Jan 6, 2021 and Mar 6, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Perforation4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 6, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE DUODENUM DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE PHYSICIAN INFORMED THAT A PATIENT SUFFERED A DUODENAL PERFORATION AFTER PLACING THE ADVANIX BILIARY STENT THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED.

    Patient problems: Perforation

    MAUDE report 24532402 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2022Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ON (B)(6) 2021, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT MIGRATED DISTALLY FROM THE COMMON BILE DUCT INTO THE DUODENUM. A SMALL PERFORATION OCCURRED IN THE DUODENUM AS A RESULT OF MIGRATION. THE STENT WAS REMOVED AND THE PERFORATION WAS CLOSED WITH CLIPS. NO NEW STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN PLACE OF THE MIGRATED STENT. ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICIAN, THE PATIENT IS "OKAY".

    Patient problems: Perforation

    MAUDE report 13179650 ↗
  • InjuryDec 21, 2021Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ON (B)(6) 2021, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT MIGRATED DISTALLY FROM THE COMMON BILE DUCT INTO THE DUODENUM. A SMALL PERFORATION OCCURRED IN THE DUODENUM AS A RESULT OF MIGRATION. THE STENT WAS REMOVED AND THE PERFORATION WAS CLOSED WITH CLIPS. NO NEW STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN PLACE OF THE MIGRATED STENT. ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICIAN, THE PATIENT IS "OKAY".

    Patient problems: Perforation

    MAUDE report 13051813 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2021Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS REMOVED FROM A PATIENT DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT. THE IMPLANT DATE AND EXPLANT DATES WERE NOT REPORTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PLANNED STENT REMOVAL PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE ADVANIX BILIARY STENT HAD MIGRATED DISTALLY AND PERFORATED THE DOUDENAL WALL. THE PERFORATION WAS CONFIRMED THROUGH ENDOSCOPY. THE MIGRATED STENT WAS REMOVED USING A PAIR OF BIOPSY FORCEPS AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO TREATMENT INFORMATION WAS REPORTED FOR THE PERFORATION. THERE WERE NO NEW STENT IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO HAVE FULLY RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Perforation

    MAUDE report 11123717 ↗

Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page